2011-06-24 - Glastonbury
Tour: Various Dates
Songs played: 20
Audio recordings: 1
Videos: 1
  1. Originally posted by dtpc191991:It's kind of odd, for me. I'm 19 and the only other big fan of the band I know in my generation is my cousin back in Ireland There actually actually well liked among my some of my friends, and hated among others. The thing I find interesting is that it tends to be the more conservative rock fans or conservative in general of my friends that don't like them. The more liberal ones seem to like them.

    I know what you mean. Now I think about it, most of my friends aren't averse to the band, they're more amused by my geekiness with them than anything. As I said before, I find the main dislike is Bono and his Bono-ness which generally detracts from the band themselves. Strangely enough, my housemate really disliked U2 at the beginning of uni., but having listened to a lot of stuff over the last couple of years since living with me, he's been swayed, especially by Pop. A few people I know will never be swayed just because U2's music isn't their kind of thing, but I think it's certainly a case of giving them a chance and people will be pleasantly surprised.
  2. Originally posted by patssox95:[..]

    its prob unfair for me to quote you and respond, but i stopped reading after the underwhelming setlist and ONE massive surprise line...



    hey that's ok - as soon as i saw your name i immediately remembered how i stopped taking you seriously a LONG time ago when you made it pretty clear to everyone that if something doesn't match up to your way of thinking then it's obviously wrong....

    they were just my personal feelings on the event and obviously a lot of people felt differently and thats fine. i wasn't expecting anything from anyone - just sharing my thoughts
  3. Originally posted by WojBhoy:[..]
    I know what you mean. Now I think about it, most of my friends aren't averse to the band, they're more amused by my geekiness with them than anything. As I said before, I find the main dislike is Bono and his Bono-ness which generally detracts from the band themselves. Strangely enough, my housemate really disliked U2 at the beginning of uni., but having listened to a lot of stuff over the last couple of years since living with me, he's been swayed, especially by Pop. A few people I know will never be swayed just because U2's music isn't their kind of thing, but I think it's certainly a case of giving them a chance and people will be pleasantly surprised.


    You've reminded me of another interesting point. My friends who do like the band like Bono as well, those who don't either have no opinion or are annoyed by his campaigns. Personally i think it's stupid to dislike a band based on the frontman's principles as opposed to the music. Which is something you seem to have encountered. Then again Bono tends to deeply involve his views in his music so I can see how disliking Bono's views could affect the enjoyment of music more than with other bands.
  4. Here's my take.Having watch the set a few times now including the various highlights shown i think they did really well.We all know the pressure was on them to deliver something special.You see U2 are now at the point in their career where there could become the new Rolling Stones (a massive live act still but not too many people other than real fans give a toss about their albums etc).And i think they must be aware of that.
    It being U2 first festival appearance for many years was always going to be a difficult experience for everyone involved, sure it wasn't perfect to us the diehards, but considering the weather, the jet lag ,the comparisons to Coldplay (which was more a media thing).,We couldn't really ask for much more as U2 had a lot more to loose than gain, if they'd tried anything too different most punters and viewers wouldn't of got it anyway like us.
    Also imagine if U2 were just about to release their fifth album, Rattle & Hum like Coldplay will be doing soon, the whole vibe,energy,excitement would've been a total experience. So i wonder how Coldplay would do if they were playing their first festival for decades in 25 years time.
    Having seen U2 many times throughout the eighties i can remember those times with many fond memories and know we'd all be writing some totally different to the mixed opinions on here if that was now.
    .
  5. To me, the main question for U2 was not "how many obscure songs can they bring up." The question on everybody's mind was "could U2 drop all the bells and whistles and stage a great performance of music." U2's live act is very well known for the amazing visual and stage designs that enhance the musical experience. But could U2 drop all those things and perform?

    U2's Glastonbury performance answered that question with an emphatic yes! There was no awe-inspiring visual of Zooropa, no massive structure of The Claw. By playing a setlist full of hits (and playing those hits well), U2 proved that beyond the amazing visual and production aspects of their live act, they have their core founded in their music.
  6. Finishing with Out of Control was such a brilliant decision. Well executed. A song that has aged really well. Just watched that performance again.
  7. Hey all, how good was Friday night?

    The Guardian, typically the snob broadsheet of the British media, gave them 4* which is pretty good. That said both Elbow & Beyonce received 5* reviews.

    Truth has been said before this; U2 are not a relevant fixture in modern day music and that's going to show amongst a mostly youthful crowd. Anyone disappointed by that need only look at the biggest grossing tours of all time and see that U2 have by far the largest average capacity crowds in concert history (ahead by some 15,000 average).

    People here do not understand the animal that is the Glastonbury audience. Or the culture that exists within Britain. Anything good they've given birth to, they demand that they are the best at it. Their attitude to football is beaten by their love of rock music. Who can blame them - they've given the world Led Zeppelin, The Stone Roses, Joy Division, Muse, The Rolling Stones, The Beatles, The Animals, Oasis, The Clash, Bowie, Pink Floyd, The Police, Queen, The Who...ok you get the point - their contribution to pop/ rock is unmatched. Foreign acts, and specifically, successful foreign acts, will always be judged suspiciously.

    Beyonce gets away with it because she offers the best of a different type of music. U2 are an Irish band playing British style-rock but they at least are not largely ignored in the same manner as the Dave Matthews band, Lynyrd Skynyrd, CCR, or Green Day.

    Therefore if the job was to win over a skeptical and hugely-patriotic crowd then they did so with flying colours.
  8. is it just me or is the audio in the HD-download slightly not in synch after that "switch" after I Will Follow?
  9. @ahm1991 Completely agree


  10. Seems to be fine on my end

    Scratch that. I think you're right. It's easier to tell when you look at Larry's drumming and the clapping of the crowd. Now that I notice it, it'll bother me forever. Sigh
  11. Originally posted by wyn525i:[..]

    Why not just get both? And if you have a PC, you don't need to make a b-ray to watch it. Just download the PS3 Media Server http://ps3mediaserver.blogspot.com/ and you can stream it to the PS3 in full HD, or just copy it straight to the PS3's hard drive. I do it all the time. Plus it's awesome for downloaded youtube vids in HD (firefox and the DownloadHelper add-on).


    Thanks!

    I just need some time, but I'll do it
  12. By the way, great review from all of you guys

    Nice to see different ways to watch the same show!