Originally posted by iTim:Ok, Boy and October, accounting for the shows where no setlist is known. Might as well compile into a complete list whilst I'm here.
Boy - 8.5
October - 4.7
War - 4.8
The Unforgettable Fire - 4.9
The Joshua Tree - 7.8
Lovetown - 6.4
Zoo TV - 9.6
Popmart - 8.2
Elevation 6.5
Vertigo - 6.9
360 - 5
Originally posted by wtshnnfb01:America will not be a great country until we purge ourselves of the parasites that are southerners. I propose that every country that wants to cut back on its nuclear arsenal fires them all at everything south of Kentucky. They are the scourge of this once great country, and must be dealt with accordingly.
Originally posted by wtshnnfb01:Someone don't get satire.
Originally posted by KieranU2:No one has answered my question yet and I blame Aaron.
Originally posted by LikeASong:[..]
I'm not a fan so my answer is obviously "no"I don't know how important is the band for you. I would consider 2 more factors: a) have you been to Manchester? (I guess so), and b) do you have the chance to make something out of the trip besides the concert? If so, go for it I'd say
Originally posted by KieranU2:[..]
In terms of importance, their first two albums – Nothing's Shocking and Ritual de lo Habitual – are in my top 50 albums of all time. In addition, they are performing that first album in full. I've been to Manchester twice: once to see Pearl Jam, the other to see Roger Waters. I probably wouldn't get much out of it. In fact, I'd probably be going on my own because none of my friends are really fans of Jane's Addiction. Only a couple are actually familiar with them. It's either go and finally see them, or not go and probably never witness them live. It's justifying the costs too. I'm getting a flat this summer and I'm doing so much (going to Poland, seeing Arcade Fire, seeing Pearl Jam multiple times).At times like these, you wish money did grow on trees.