Originally posted by Caledonia:Washington Post...
"A thrilling listen"
https://www.washingtonpost.com/entertainment/music/review-u2s-songs-of-experience-is-a-thrilling-listen/2017/11/28/935aa60e-d459-11e7-9ad9-ca0619edfa05_story.html?utm_term=.8388324662d4
But when it comes to Bono’s offshore financial dealings and The Edge’s controversial plan for homes in Malibu, there may still be some ‘splainin’ to do.
Originally posted by cesar_garza01:[..]
[..]
Why did they have to mention that silly thing? For critics, it's like they have to say "Bono is a tax evader" to be taken seriously or something. This was supposed to be a review of SOE and they brought that up out of nowhere. It's the new "capitalist pig".
Originally posted by cesar_garza01:[..]
[..]
Why did they have to mention that silly thing? For critics, it's like they have to say "Bono is a tax evader" to be taken seriously or something. This was supposed to be a review of SOE and they brought that up out of nowhere. It's the new "capitalist pig".
Originally posted by RattleandHum1988:Meh, fuck reviews good or bad![]()
I’ll be over here enjoying a new U2 album that I can’t get enough of.
Originally posted by KleWdSide:I'm too lazy to look back but...
Is SOE better than its predecessor?
Originally posted by CMIPalaeo:I don't think it's better. But, I also have a hard time considering the two albums separately. For me, they're always going to be Songs of Innocence and of Experience from here on in...