REC
Active topics
  3. Hello,
    I noticed that in 1989-09-28 - Sydney there's a problem with the recording speed.....Bono's voice is too fast and the music as well.
    Would it be possible to fix that problem?

    Thanks!
  4. Originally posted by stefano1973Hello,
    I noticed that in 1989-09-28 - Sydney there's a problem with the recording speed.....Bono's voice is too fast and the music as well.
    Would it be possible to fix that problem?

    Thanks!


    Would be possible I think...will look at it.
  7. You wouldn't be able to give the 2nd Vertigo Twickenham (2005-06-19 ) show a go by any chance guys? I don't know how these remasters all work but it sounds like it would be worth "cleaning" up, if that's the term for it
  8. Originally posted by WojBhoyYou wouldn't be able to give the 2nd Vertigo Twickenham (2005-06-19 ) show a go by any chance guys? I don't know how these remasters all work but it sounds like it would be worth "cleaning" up, if that's the term for it


    the current version on here is very muddy. I suppose you want it for Wild Horses? Unfortunately it's not being seeded anywhere at the moment but when it pops up again i'll do the business and have it on here.

    EDIT : None of these are remasters. I've simply re-encoded these from the original lossless files.
  9. Originally posted by germcevoy[..]

    the current version on here is very muddy. I suppose you want it for Wild Horses? Unfortunately it's not being seeded anywhere at the moment but when it pops up again i'll do the business and have it on here.

    EDIT : None of these are remasters. I've simply re-encoded these from the original lossless files.

    EDIT - Not just WGRYWH (although that was a part of my thinking, it must be said ), but also that the show sounds pretty good from what I've listened to so far, but like you say, it's quite deep and muddy, so I was wondering whether it would be deemed worthy of an upgrade.
  10. Originally posted by WojBhoy[..]
    Not just WGRYWH (although that was a part of my thinking, it must be said ), but also that the show sounds pretty good from what I've listened to so far, but like you say, it's quite deep and muddy, so I was wondering whether it would be worth a remaster.


    i'll leave any possible remaster to someone who has taper permission but i'm certain that a fresh mp3 conversion from lossless would provide a decent upgrade
  11. Originally posted by germcevoy[..]

    i'll leave any possible remaster to someone who has taper permission but i'm certain that a fresh mp3 conversion from lossless would provide a decent upgrade

    Ok mate, sounds good to me if possible
Contribute to the U2 community with uploading photos or by telling us which shows you have visited.
Contribute to the U2 community with uploading photos or by telling us which shows you have visited.
Contribute to the U2 community with uploading photos or by telling us which shows you have visited.
Contribute to the U2 community with uploading photos or by telling us which shows you have visited.