Originally posted by emieli think it's a great album but way to short 45.minutes
REM's new album came in at 35 minutes. Nothing wrong with a short album (as long as it's good).
Originally posted by emieli think it's a great album but way to short 45.minutes
Originally posted by germcevoy[..]
REM's new album came in at 35 minutes. Nothing wrong with a short album (as long as it's good).
Originally posted by stj0691the 2009 Grammys: my prediction
Album of the Year: U2
Record of the Year: Viva la Vida so far... then to be taken away by U2
Song of the Year: U2
Best New Artist: don't care?
Album of the year could come down between REM, Coldplay and U2
but we all know who will walk away with the win......
Originally posted by thefly07[..]
if U2 is out in Oct/Nov I don't think they will be eligible, maybe their new single will be
Originally posted by Ali709Despite all the things some of you guys say...I like the album, I like Viva La Vida, Violet Hill, Lovers In Japan more than the others..and I do enjoy the other songs, like Death And All His Friends, Lost and Cemeteries of London very much.
I didn't like the strawberry thing, and haven't listened to 42 or Yes as of yet...
Originally posted by kisho8[..]
Yes! is simpley one of the amazing songs on the album
you gotta listen to it
Originally posted by stj0691[..]
perhaps U2 speed things up and release the album in September, I believe the cutoff is Sept 30th.
Originally posted by MWSAH[..]
U2 is smart...they will compete for the grammies next year, so they don't have to compete with REM and Coldplay now.
