1. People think I'm mad, and then I mention the Red Hot Chili Pepper's Californication. It is, one of the loudest and most distorted albums in music history due to crap mastering. Even the fans, who couldn't care less, complained and are asking for the album to be reissued.


    Here's something interesting:

    Oasis' What's The Story Morning Glory from 1995 achieves -8 dBFS. That may not be rare now, but it was back in 1995. That means it's a god damned loud album, due to mastering yet again. Iggy Pop and The Stooges remixed and remastered Raw Power from 1973. It is the loudest rock album ever recorded, achieving -4 dBFS in some places. Why artists and the labels have to do this, is beyond me.

    This is all due to iPods, and the MP3 age (damn Napster). They have an algorithm built in called a finaliser. Not an equaliser, but finaliser. It finalises the sound level, or you might know it better as a sound check. That's designed to lower the volume but keep the sound levels consistent. However, with people ripping their CDs (hopefully none of the following above or below) at 128Kbps through iTunes, Windows Media Player etc, which use terribly outdated MP3 encoding software - iTunes is up to five years old, I don't even know what WMP is using - it still sounds crap.

    An MP3 might be 80% smaller than a FLAC (anywhere upwards of 350Kbps) or 85% smaller than a WAV file (1411Kbps), but all the goodness of the sound is thrown away! I've bought albums, quite recently and the songs are mastered so badly, I cannot listen to it. This is an album from 1982, remastered for 2006.



    And that's not all. Loud albums recorded include:

    Christina Aguliera - Back To Basics
    Lily Allen - Alright, Still
    The Arctic Monkeys - Whatever People Say I Am, That's What I'm Not
    Paul McCartney - Memory Almost Full
    Red Hot Chili Peppers - Californication
    Red Hot Chili Peppers - Stadium Arcadium
    Led Zepellin - Mothership
    Fall Out Boy - Infinity on High




    Where does U2 fit in all of this? Presenting The Joshua Tree sound levels. Look!



    Above: Original recording, 1987 - With or Without You (excellent)

    Below: Remastered recording, 2007 - With or Without You (very good)







    But wait...there's more.


    Nirvana - Smells Like Teen Spirit (good) (1991








    The Arctic Monkeys - I Bet You Look Good On The Dance Floor (very bad) (2006)




    So looking at this one above, in particular, it never comes down from heavy distortion.
  2. Funny you mention RHCP: Californication It's one of the worst sounding albums ever for sure. The music is good, but the recording process had some big flaws. Assurance for a good headache.
  3. Erm...I almost understood what you said, Drew
  4. Originally posted by drewhiggins:[..]

    People think I'm mad, and then I mention the Red Hot Chili Pepper's Californication. It is, one of the loudest and most distorted albums in music history due to crap mastering. Even the fans, who couldn't care less, complained and are asking for the album to be reissued.


    Here's something interesting:

    Oasis' What's The Story Morning Glory from 1995 achieves -8 dBFS. That may not be rare now, but it was back in 1995. That means it's a god damned loud album, due to mastering yet again. Iggy Pop and The Stooges remixed and remastered Raw Power from 1973. It is the loudest rock album ever recorded, achieving -4 dBFS in some places. Why artists and the labels have to do this, is beyond me.

    This is all due to iPods, and the MP3 age (damn Napster). They have an algorithm built in called a finaliser. Not an equaliser, but finaliser. It finalises the sound level, or you might know it better as a sound check. That's designed to lower the volume but keep the sound levels consistent. However, with people ripping their CDs (hopefully none of the following above or below) at 128Kbps through iTunes, Windows Media Player etc, which use terribly outdated MP3 encoding software - iTunes is up to five years old, I don't even know what WMP is using - it still sounds crap.

    An MP3 might be 80% smaller than a FLAC (anywhere upwards of 350Kbps) or 85% smaller than a WAV file (1411Kbps), but all the goodness of the sound is thrown away! I've bought albums, quite recently and the songs are mastered so badly, I cannot listen to it. This is an album from 1982, remastered for 2006.



    And that's not all. Loud albums recorded include:

    Christina Aguliera - Back To Basics
    Lily Allen - Alright, Still
    The Arctic Monkeys - Whatever People Say I Am, That's What I'm Not
    Paul McCartney - Memory Almost Full
    Red Hot Chili Peppers - Californication
    Red Hot Chili Peppers - Stadium Arcadium
    Led Zepellin - Mothership
    Fall Out Boy - Infinity on High




    Where does U2 fit in all of this? Presenting The Joshua Tree sound levels. Look!

    [image]

    Above: Original recording, 1987 - With or Without You (excellent)

    Below: Remastered recording, 2007 - With or Without You (very good)

    [image]





    But wait...there's more.


    Nirvana - Smells Like Teen Spirit (good) (1991

    [image]






    The Arctic Monkeys - I Bet You Look Good On The Dance Floor (very bad) (2006)

    [image]


    So looking at this one above, in particular, it never comes down from heavy distortion.


    didn't i post something similar before?
  5. I also think that The Killers albums (especially Sam's Town) are also way too loud, because when listening to it trough earphones my ears get tired very fast and sometimes headache comes in.

    That makes me sad because they're one of my favorite bands. Luckily U2 and The National aren't to loud. : ))
  6. Originally posted by Yogi:I also think that The Killers albums (especially Sam's Town) are also way too loud, because when listening to it trough earphones my ears get tired very fast and sometimes headache comes in.

    That makes me sad because they're one of my favorite bands. Luckily U2 and The National aren't to loud. : ))


    Why don't you just turn down the volume on whatever your listening to it through? In my opinion I didn't like Sam's Town much. Compared to Sawdust and Hot Fuss I didn't think it was that great.
  7. Originally posted by Yogi:I also think that The Killers albums (especially Sam's Town) are also way too loud, because when listening to it trough earphones my ears get tired very fast and sometimes headache comes in.

    That makes me sad because they're one of my favorite bands. Luckily U2 and The National aren't to loud. : ))


    I like Sam's Town because it is loud and U2 certainly is LOUD. see them live (or have you?) but I know you are referring to cds
  8. Originally posted by thefly07:[..]

    I like Sam's Town because it is loud and U2 certainly is LOUD. see them live (or have you?) but I know you are referring to cds


    The loudness of the performance is fine. The mastering is the issue. Those diagrams are taken from the same RS article you got it from originally.
  9. Originally posted by drewhiggins:[..]

    The loudness of the performance is fine. The mastering is the issue. Those diagrams are taken from the same RS article you got it from originally.


    i don't even understand those diagrams lol


  10. The higher the lines constantly are, the worse the mastering (and the loudness) is.
  11. Originally posted by RattleandHum1988:[..]

    Why don't you just turn down the volume on whatever your listening to it through? In my opinion I didn't like Sam's Town much. Compared to Sawdust and Hot Fuss I didn't think it was that great.


    You can't fix mastered loudness with turning down the volume.

  12. I spew at current music. Everybody listens to onedayfly music and Hiphop, R&B and who the fuck it's called. Only on classic rock stations they play decent and great stuff, but on the 'trendy' stations they play tunes, no music in my opinion.


    Some of it is truly awful. It's one reason I bought an MP3 player and continue to buy CDs released in 1975. Actually, if you want a brilliant song, try and look for Jethro Tull's Thick As A Brick. The live performances of it are almost 12 minutes long - with a killer guitar solo - and the studio version is almost 45 minutes long.

    What exactly is onedayfly music?



    Yogi is right; because the distortion is always there. The only way to fix mastered loudness is with the original master tapes, as is the case with the four remasters and other album remasters. But the tapes may be in such terrible condition, from many years of exposure to dust, light and whatever else, that it's an effect you cannot remove even with the best industry tools (ProTools).

    Quite simply, if the mastering problems are evident on the original source (CD), then volume won't fix it. You can't polish a turd. I think the industry should start putting labels on the album covers for warnings of excessive loudness - they do it for copy-protection warnings and FBI anti-piracy warnings, why not start doing it for excessive loudness?

    One thing I get annoyed about on recent releases is the ''Essing'' effect - when you're listening to something, if the singer pronounces "She sells seashells by the seashore", you hear heavy emphasis on the S parts. ProTools, and even free and open-source software always have plug-ins and options to remove it, so why don't producers and sound engineers make use of it? It may not sound natural, but it will save listeners from getting an earache.


    ProTools is below, if anyone wants to see what it looks like. It is a fantastic app...possibly the best multimedia tool available today.