GEN
Active topics
  1. We desperately need more posts about if Eno ever gets enthusiastic about anything and the gasoline/submarine line.
    That and a topic where people post "I'm so excited" all the time and one where the fanboys and -girls can smash the peopling daring to not hyperventilate when it's about Sexy Bono or the album.

    Come on people - Yes we can.

    That reminds me: We also need a topic speculating about U2 presenting the new single at ObamaS inauguration.
  2. Originally posted by yeah:We desperately need more posts about if Eno ever gets enthusiastic about anything and the gasoline/submarine line.
    That and a topic where people post "I'm so excited" all the time and one where the fanboys and -girls can smash the peopling daring to not hyperventilate when it's about Sexy Bono or the album.

    Come on people - Yes we can.

    That reminds me: We also need a topic speculating about U2 presenting the new single at ObamaS inauguration.


    this was not necessary...


  3. Laugh about it and move on I'd say

    It's about time the speculation can stop and we have all the songs, lyrics, song titles and album cover. Then we can have some real discussions.
  4. Originally posted by yeah:

    That reminds me: We also need a topic speculating about U2 presenting the new single at ObamaS inauguration.


    Also a boots topic. Not necessarily "on" or "sexy," but boots in general. !!!!!11!!1
  5. Originally posted by Remy:[..]

    Laugh about it and move on I'd say

    It's about time the speculation can stop and we have all the songs, lyrics, song titles and album cover. Then we can have some real discussions.


    I usually enjoy the man's comments and get a good laugh as they are very well timed, but this one didn't seem so...anyways, move on you say...

    A leak of the first single is badly needed, but guess that won't happen. BTW, is it Get On Your Boots or Get Your Boots On ?!
  6. Originally posted by Ali709:[..]

    I usually enjoy the man's comments and get a good laugh as they are very well timed, but this one didn't seem so...anyways, move on you say...

    A leak of the first single is badly needed, but guess that won't happen. BTW, is it Get On Your Boots or Get Your Boots On ?!


    Originally it was named Get Your Boots On, now it's Get On Your Boots. Which I think, is better.


  7. See, that would be a good topic.
    Put this up on interference, you'll get 20 pages, starting with someone who's gonna tell you why "Get on your boots" is a highly political track about a soldier who's seen the war in Lebanon while someone else is making the point that "Get your boots on" sound like a trivial song that doesn't suit a band like U2. Then someone would post a youtube link with Jessica Simpson and the topic blows into Coldplay bashing.

    It's only entertainment, is it?

    Pardon me, for some reason I find all this tea leaves reading highly hilarious right now. I'll get back to my usual bitching tomorrow.
  8. All the frustration of all those months and years of waiting comes together and everyone is talking about details that actually doesn't matter etcetera. As Remy said: it's time we hear about everything and then we can have a proper talk. Now it's more reacting to each other about rumours....
  9. Originally posted by yeah:[..]

    See, that would be a good topic.
    Put this up on interference, you'll get 20 pages, starting with someone who's gonna tell you why "Get on your boots" is a highly political track about a soldier who's seen the war in Lebanon while someone else is making the point that "Get your boots on" sound like a trivial song that doesn't suit a band like U2. Then someone would post a youtube link with Jessica Simpson and the topic blows into Coldplay bashing.

    It's only entertainment, is it?

    Pardon me, for some reason I find all this tea leaves reading highly hilarious right now. I'll get back to my usual bitching tomorrow.


    See? Our government isn't that corrupt, now I see why interference is filtered here!! With all that I'm hearing from you guys I'm glad I'm not a member on that site.

    Originally posted by dieder:All the frustration of all those months and years of waiting comes together and everyone is talking about details that actually doesn't matter etcetera. As Remy said: it's time we hear about everything and then we can have a proper talk. Now it's more reacting to each other about rumours....


    Just what I was saying in the other topic, we don't HAVE to discuss something when there is nothing valuable to discuss... the single is probably a week away, just wait...
  10. Interference is filtered and U2start isn't? I hope for you it will stay like that, I mean, they can easily filter all websites with U2 in his title...
  11. Originally posted by dieder:Interference is filtered and U2start isn't? I hope for you it will stay like that, I mean, they can easily filter all websites with U2 in his title...


    Nothing U2-related is filtered, they don't care, what's filtered usually is opposition sites, porn and anti-filtering sites...I have no idea why interference is filtered...we're OT by the way.
  12. Originally posted by yeah:We desperately need more posts about if Eno ever gets enthusiastic about anything and the gasoline/submarine line.
    That and a topic where people post "I'm so excited" all the time and one where the fanboys and -girls can smash the peopling daring to not hyperventilate when it's about Sexy Bono or the album.

    Come on people - Yes we can.

    That reminds me: We also need a topic speculating about U2 presenting the new single at ObamaS inauguration.


    Lol, I like the cut of your jib

U2start is run by fans for fans. Help us reduce personal costs. Consider to make a donation to support us.
U2start is run by fans for fans. Help us reduce personal costs. Consider to make a donation to support us.
U2start is run by fans for fans. Help us reduce personal costs. Consider to make a donation to support us.
U2start is run by fans for fans. Help us reduce personal costs. Consider to make a donation to support us.