Originally posted by Yogi:As future journalist and someone who writes movie reviews it's hard to take all these reviews seriously because you can't know what journalist prefers, what kind of music he likes, anything.
Because when I watch film, I can review it the way I want. I could shit all over it, but in the same time, I could tell that it's masterpiece. I could even write "black" and "white" review of the film with arguments and in both cases I could be serious.
Originally posted by blink:which song did some reviewers compare to One again??
I DON*T UNDERSTAND YOU BABYFACE.WHAT ARE HELL ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT?
PHASER REWIEV DOESN*T MAKE SENSE AND IT IS INSANE!
I WILL ASK YOU-WHO CAN TELL A LOT OF BAD THINGS FOR ALBUM AFTER ALL SONGS AND SNIPPETS THAT ALL WE HEARD.COBL,ABOY,OOTS,VERTIGA ARE AWESOME...MAN WHO DARES TO GIVE ALBUM 3/10 IS COMPLETELY IDIOT.
I MUST THAT BONO*S VOICE ON TOTP PERFORMANCE WAS MARVEOLUS AND BRILLIANT...AS ITCOMES FROM ACHTUNG ERA!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I SUGGEST EVERY FAN OF U2 TO NOT READ ALL THESE STUPID THREADS WHICH ARE AIMED TO HARM U2 AND THEIR REMARKABLE CARER.
ALL NEWSPAPER REWIEVS OF ALBUM ARE VERY GOOD AND POSITIVE AND ALL MUSIC CRITICS TIL NOW WERE POSITIVELY SUPRISED ABOUT *BOMB*
LET GOD HELP THESE BOYS WHODON*T KNOW WHAT THEY SAID!!!!!!!!!!!!
U2 IS THE GREATEST AND THEY WILL SHOW ON THE NEXT TOUR!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
U2 FOREVER!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Originally posted by Yogi:Because when I watch film...I could shit all over it
Originally posted by yeah:Someone could set up something like this for the "bad" reviewers:
[..]
Originally posted by yeah:Someone could set up something like this for the "bad" reviewers:
[..]
Originally posted by WojBhoy:[..]
I'd pay to see that...
Originally posted by Yogi:As future journalist and someone who writes movie reviews it's hard to take all these reviews seriously because you can't know what journalist prefers, what kind of music he likes, anything.
Because when I watch film, I can review it the way I want. I could shit all over it, but in the same time, I could tell that it's masterpiece. I could even write "black" and "white" review of the film with arguments and in both cases I could be serious.
Originally posted by haytrain:[..]
Right, but what keeps you from writing your movie reviews in that "black & white" sense? I'm guessing a sense that you must remain as objective as possible, that it is a part of your journalistic duties. Probably the same sense that these critics have when they write their reviews.
Originally posted by haytrain:
Originally posted by Yogi:[..]
Objectiveness is not as much important in journalism as it used to be. The most important thing today is something called fairness.
If you read that Austrian review, it's not objective at all. If you want to be objective you shouldn't judge or rate anything, just speak of facts. But then again we couldn't enjoy in positive reviews and shit all over negative ones.