1. Problem with Grammy's with the bridge was that they were ending too high... the chorus and bridge are better here indeed.... well it's an improvement. Hopefully a HD-recording will surface tomorrow including a lossless bootleg.
  2. Agreed, it was better than the Grammy's. But it still lacked something. It just hasn't clicked yet and it's disappointing considering this is meant to be promoting the album. But if it gets better each and every time they perform it, then I shall not complain.

    It needs us U2 fans to grab it.

    Sidenote: Who is in charge of the audio set up for these mass gatherings? Youths hired by Earls Court/Brit Awards?
  3. Now I watched video and that was really really good. Not great or excellent, but really good, I bet the third time, with sound like this it will be great.

    Everyone was excited by Grammy performance witch was...well...not great, and now this is much better and most of you think it's shite. *confused*
  4. Originally posted by Yogi:Now I watched video and that was really really good. Not great or excellent, but really good, I bet the third time, with sound like this it will be great.

    Everyone was excited by Grammy performance witch was...well...not great, and now this is much better and most of you think it's shite. *confused*


    U2 fans sometimes seek the best. And being negative urges you to get better results.
  5. Originally posted by Yogi:Now I watched video and that was really really good. Not great or excellent, but really good, I bet the third time, with sound like this it will be great.

    Everyone was excited by Grammy performance witch was...well...not great, and now this is much better and most of you think it's shite. *confused*


    liked the grammy. now this was better, like it too. my first opinion was no good.
  6. but where are his sexy boots from a few months ago?

  7. larry and bman are both wearing the same type of jacket
  8. was a lot better than the grammys

    edge's playing was a lot louder