1. Bullshit imho, the same thing was said last tour, and it didn't happen then so let's wait until some announcement before getting excited. And on the time lapse, it can take 48 hours minimum on the tour, but a week or even a year also occures.
  2. Or never. There are still a few shows that are not recorded or shared. There also sources that dont surface for years
  3. Originally posted by Risto:Or never. There are still a few shows that are not recorded or shared. There also sources that dont surface for years


    Indeed, there's nothing to say about it
  4. Originally posted by Remy:Bullshit imho, the same thing was said last tour, and it didn't happen then so let's wait until some announcement before getting excited. And on the time lapse, it can take 48 hours minimum on the tour, but a week or even a year also occures.


    you can call bullshit, but like i said i know its happening. contracts are already signed, the deal is done. i got nothing to gain from lying about it, just sharing the news, not trying to get everyone stirred and up and excited. i imagine it'll be announced with the tour and/or the new site. Same source told me the tour starts in May/June

    to be honest i was shocked to hear it myself, as U2 aren't the type to mix up their set and experiment live so it almost doesn't make sense. However, it's a business and there is mucho money to be made in this area from them, just like it's happening for other big names bands these days
  5. You might be right Remy just says that last tour there were similar stories. And we all know U2 did not sell bootlegs.

    As long it doesnt push U2Start in to a gray area I welcome every live bootleg there is I definetely would pay for a great concert with low quality source on U2Start

    Time will tell
  6. Originally posted by Risto:You might be right Remy just says that last tour there were similar stories. And we all know U2 did not sell bootlegs.

    As long it doesnt push U2Start in to a gray area I welcome every live bootleg there is I definetely would pay for a great concert with low quality source on U2Start

    Time will tell


    yep...i know it

    never know for sure until it's actually here. fingers crossed

  7. Originally posted by rlaw80:[..]

    you can call bullshit, but like i said i know its happening. contracts are already signed, the deal is done. i got nothing to gain from lying about it, just sharing the news, not trying to get everyone stirred and up and excited. i imagine it'll be announced with the tour and/or the new site. Same source told me the tour starts in May/June

    to be honest i was shocked to hear it myself, as U2 aren't the type to mix up their set and experiment live so it almost doesn't make sense. However, it's a business and there is mucho money to be made in this area from them, just like it's happening for other big names bands these days


    I hope you're right matey. Would be great to have the show you attended in great quality..
  8. If they do offer a service, I hope you can dl, not just stream


  9. it'll be downloads, just as bands like Pearl Jam and Dave Mathews have been doing for several years

  10. Originally posted by Risto:You might be right Remy just says that last tour there were similar stories. And we all know U2 did not sell bootlegs.

    As long it doesnt push U2Start in to a gray area I welcome every live bootleg there is I definetely would pay for a great concert with low quality source on U2Start

    Time will tell


    Agree, it would be great if they offer it, no doubt. Imagine audience bootlegs here free for download, and a direct link to U2.com where you can pay for an HQ recording. HQ recordings of every show, I would pay for that no doubt