Originally posted by yeah:[image]
God that's terrible
Originally posted by yeah:[image]
Originally posted by germcevoy:God that's terrible
Originally posted by germcevoy:[..]
God that's terrible
Originally posted by haytrain:[well......(searching for a positive)......the birds are cool. :? [/quote]The birds are quite cool indeed.
I dislike the overall futuristic-photoshopic-overexposed-typical scent of the photo but I wouldn't say "horrible". Just average for me. Nice single it will be.
Originally posted by vanquish:
I was expecting some shots of the band in Fez or something (like in the album packaging).
Originally posted by yeah:[..]
And that's exactly what the cover is showing.
Originally posted by vanquish:What a crap cover, why does it look like the Boots cover? It's a completely different song.
I was expecting some shots of the band in Fez or something (like in the album packaging).
Originally posted by yeah:[..]
I guess both are having a word in it. I'd think that the band has the last word on it, though.
Mp3 and illegal downloading would be the 'justification' the industry uses. Not a valid point imho but that's what they use as standard. They don't realize that if they want people to buy something, they have to make it worth buying. Which isn't the case with the recent b-sides.
Originally posted by markp91:[..]
It's the same album/era, pretty logical it's the same style