1. Originally posted by yuri31:[..]

    they haven't stopped their nuclear programme despite the sanctions, you never know if they're not building an atomic bomb


    Again, very true yes
    But how far can they get with an atomic bomb? Not far enough to hit America, Australia, Japan or Western Europe.
    So call me selfish or ignorant, but I couldn't care less
  2. Originally posted by yeah:[..]

    Well, right now we learn how it feels like when a few US banks crash.
    Can you imagine how it will feel when Iran stops all Oil and gas transfers?


    I can imagine, yes
    Would mean less people driving, so it would be good for the environment.
  3. Originally posted by markp91:[..]

    Again, very true yes
    But how far can they get with an atomic bomb? Not far enough to hit America, Australia, Japan or Western Europe.
    So call me selfish or ignorant, but I couldn't care less


    No, that's not selfish or ignorant. That's short sighted, naive and just plain stupid.


  4. Yep, because that's all what oil and gas are used for. Cars.
  5. Originally posted by markp91:[..]

    Again, very true yes
    But how far can they get with an atomic bomb? Not far enough to hit America, Australia, Japan or Western Europe.
    So call me selfish or ignorant, but I couldn't care less


    Yes! As long as it doesn't hit western asses, it's ok radiation doesn't hurt people here, after Chernobyl we are imune


  6. Okay...
    I guess we'll notice it whenever they shoot an atomic bomb

  7. Nope
    I'm just trying to see a good side in this
    Cause I think exaggerating is one of the main causes of (for instance this financial) crisis.
    Originally posted by yuri31:[..]

    Yes! As long as it doesn't hit western asses, it's ok radiation doesn't hurt people here, after Chernobyl we are imune


    You know what I mean.


  8. Iran can be considered as a serious threat, that's why dialogues should be lead with them.


  9. Oh, I don't deny that, absolutely not.
    They're very dangerous, yes
    But there's still such a thing as threat among countries. If Iran would do something, as in attacking an American supported country, there's a thing called the NAVO
    And the NAVO is a shitty organisation, yes, but they would be able to do something back against Iran.
  10. Originally posted by yeah:[..]

    Well, right now we learn how it feels like when a few US banks crash.
    Can you imagine how it will feel when Iran stops all Oil and gas transfers?

    That's why we need to find alternate sources of energy(And not just for cars) ASAP
  11. Originally posted by markp91:[..]

    Oh, I don't deny that, absolutely not.
    They're very dangerous, yes
    But there's still such a thing as threat among countries. If Iran would do something, as in attacking an American supported country, there's a thing called the NAVO
    And the NAVO is a shitty organisation, yes, but they would be able to do something back against Iran.


    Don't forget the UN, Russia, China...NATO isn't that powerful as they seem to be.
  12. Originally posted by markp91:[..]

    Oh, I don't deny that, absolutely not.
    They're very dangerous, yes
    But there's still such a thing as threat among countries. If Iran would do something, as in attacking an American supported country, there's a thing called the NAVO
    And the NAVO is a shitty organisation, yes, but they would be able to do something back against Iran.


    No no no, you can't point a finger at them and say they are the enemies, that would lead nowhere. It's important to be in a dialogue with them, see what aims they have and try to make an agreement which would avoid a conflict. And organisations like UN and NATO play an important role here. UN must do as much as possible to avoid a war, and if there's a war started, NATO have to protect the countries which are members of the organisation.

    Communication is the thing But having heard Ahmadinejad's speech, it doesn't look like there's much to do in this case, this guy is just crazy.