Originally posted by dieder:I heard new single in 3 weeks: I'll Go Crazy
isn't that a bit soon

Originally posted by dieder:I heard new single in 3 weeks: I'll Go Crazy
Originally posted by thefly07:[..]
isn't that a bit soon![]()
Originally posted by katherine94:[..]
Seems like it. Although they could be really trying to get a hit out soon![]()
Originally posted by U2wandererMusicTAP is reporting that a Magnificent EP will be released for the US market, for download on May 19 and on CD on June 9. Chris at The Ideal Copy has confirmed with his supplier that the EP from Interscope is titled Magnificent Remixes, though no track listing is yet available
Originally posted by Yogi:http://www.vimeo.com/4679276
Video of Magnificent my friend did. It's not perfect and still needs some work but it's better then original.
Check it out. ;)
Originally posted by vanquish:Basically all notable U2 albums have been commercially successfull, take Achtung Baby, JT, ATYCLB, HTDAAB.
Originally posted by WojBhoy:[..]
Or are you simply saying they're notable works for their having been commercially successful? TUF is often regarded as one of their noteworthy works because it was the point when they delved into unknown musical territory by bringing Eno and Lanois into the mix, but was it the commercial giant that HTDAAB was? Not at all.
Originally posted by AllBeacauseOfZoo:[..]
Yes I too thought that 42 is a complete joke.....in fact I thought number 12 was poor for GOYB.....I think this is a classic....but to be honest I complained when Beautiful Day was over-played and kind of ruined the song for me after a while......maybe this album is for the fans only.....and maybe because of this we, the true fans, will love this album for longer...
Originally posted by u2nutter:[..]
42 and, erm...out.
Originally posted by vanquish:Well, obviously there is a correlation between the two factors, ie. a good album is likely to enjoy greater commercial success.
And its hardly fair to compare the success of TUF with albums released while they held the status of 'biggest band' in the world ie. HTDAAB.
And anyway TUF is quite comparable to HTDAAB in terms of quality. It's not like a masterpiece such as AB or JT failed to be a huge commercial success
Originally posted by WojBhoy:[..]
I think the first point is debatable seeing as I don't actually think the quality of an album means much these days where commercial success is concerned. The general feeling I detect when I talk to people nowadays is that there isn't much in the way of quality music around at the moment, yet albums are still selling the world over. I think what's more key is how an album is promoted etc., and I think most agree that NLOTH has had a raw deal where the commercial aspect of it is concerned. I'm not too keyed up on the music world c. 2004/5 but seeing as HTDAAB cleaned up at the Grammys, there can't have been much competition lol, and ATYCLB was the album that brought them back into the mainstream - we could argue day and night about whether it's better than Pop but a killer lead single does wonders for an album's success, as Beautiful Day proved (same as Vertigo, in fairness). If an album is made commercially viable, it looks after itself - NLOTH never had that kind of grounding unlike ATYCLB and HTDAAB because they were albums that connect easily with the mainstream music industry. The fact that JT and AB were amazing albums is, I feel, almost second place to the way they were broadcast on the commercial stage, JT being treated as the big album that really brought U2 to the forefront of the rock world and AB being the one where they reinvented themselves. I don't get the impression that many people outside of U2 fandom and those who know their music pretty well actually know much about the music on those respective albums though.