Originally posted by dieder:[..]
Agree with this.
thats what I took away from the Barcelona shows. Such a simple but effective change
Originally posted by dieder:[..]
Agree with this.
Originally posted by LikeASong:[..]I hnoestly disagree. That's not the right approach, the right way. OK, after 50 concerts you would have 70 new songs played but... the extremely little variation of the setlist would make it as boring as the POPMart tour for me (that was THE real down of the PoP tour for me, the very little setlist changing! the performance was great, the stage awesome, the multimedia amazing ... but there was the setlist problem. Butchered the tour for me.)
They'd better stick to 35 or 40 songs (not 70) and rotate the different setlist structures. I know I have said this a million times today, but it's what I really feel.
Originally posted by LikeASong:I gotta LOVE all that posts you the Dutch-men have made in just one minute. Magical moment, I'm really touched and amazed.
Cheers to The Netherlands![]()
Originally posted by Remy:A photo for the Dutchies from Risto:
http://img172.imageshack.us/i/08072009255.jpg/
U2 posters on Amsterdam train stations!
Originally posted by Remy:A photo for the Dutchies from Risto:
http://img172.imageshack.us/i/08072009255.jpg/
U2 posters on Amsterdam train stations!
Originally posted by germcevoy:[..]
All this setlist needs is a rotational encore. That, with the changeable mid section = gold
Originally posted by yeah:[..]
Nah, it needs about 12-15 songs replaced.![]()
Originally posted by yeah:[..]
Nah, it needs about 12-15 songs replaced.![]()
Originally posted by germcevoy:[..]
Generally speaking. . . .
we are hard men to impress though.