1. Originally posted by platonic:lol I hear ya, bro
    in that case, I appreciate the effort on that post. I don't know if my eyes would have survived one long paragraph.
    Striving eternally... that's what we gotta do. If I remember correctly, that's basically the big theme of Goethe's Faust, and I seem to have a quote to prove it:
    "Who strives always to the utmost,
    For him there is salvation."

    Yeah definitely, I guess it's reflective of the idea of change and evolution - life is all about change, and we've been given the choice to embrace such concepts and develop with it, or alternatively sit out one's years in the hope that it'll simply pass one by because you don't want to move from your comfort zone - I know which option I prefer
    Originally posted by platonic:That's quite a hardcore statement. Come to think of it, It's been too long since I read up on Voltaire. I just remember thoroughly disliking Candide.

    Voltaire is someone I've always wanted to take the time to look into more thoroughly than I have, I mean there's a lot of stuff in his arsenal, as it were, that really ring true with me at first appearances, that quote included. I find myself disagreeing with a few things people around me say, but it helps you learn and accept other people by evaluating the differences in all walks of life, but I believe it's getting the balance between rights and responsibilities. I am no fan of extreme political views such as fascism or indeed Stalinist communism etc., but I also believe that everyone should be allowed to express such views. However, if by such expression one infringes the rights of others, then you forfeit such a right to free speech, and that's where the balance needs to be made and also a key point that I feel many ignore nowadays. There's always a focus on the rights of the people etc., but it is rarely pointed out that with rights comes responsibility, and as I said above, there are those in our societies who neglect to uphold their duties responsibly.
    Originally posted by platonic:I need to stop you right there and ask 'can one ever completely trust one's gov't'? But I'm sure you already agree with the idea that a citizen must be well-informed and watchful - you just didn't get around to writing that in your post. No problem - I got your back.

    and about the leader needing brains as well as balls: true true. I don't doubt Obama has the brains (plus all the advisors he could ever need), but why doesn't he muscle something up?? He's still got the popularity.

    I do completely agree and you did certainly read in to what I forgot to say lol - the people need to feel a certain level of trust with completely trusting, which is where it is the responsibility of the people to make sure those in power are kept in check, e.g. the media.

    The recent scandals we've seen in the UK concerning public expenses and politicians abusing their rights and cheating the system, whilst not exactly helpful in the short term, would have been unthinkable 40-50 years ago when the media was much more passive and obliging. It does beg the question as to how far should the mass media be allowed to dig for content and where the lines should be drawn (if any) BUT it provides a very powerful watchdog. It does hark back to the idea concerning the rights and responsibilities in society held by those within it but then I would imagine that you can also draw on the idea regarding the forfeit of rights through the abuse of responsibilities and suffering the consequences. In the case of the media, I think that the responsibility lies in keeping abuses of power in check through broadcasting information regarding the whys and wherefores etc. BUT it shouldn't abuse such responsibility to the extent of personal gain.
    Originally posted by platonic:First of all, it's not everyone's calling to run a country (or should I say 'serve the people' cough cough), so don't you dare feel a sliver of shame about it.

    On the last point, I would like to offer some encouragement. I know it sounds trite and naive, but maybe I've listened to too much Napalm Death, Immortal Technique, Bob Marley, The Clash and, yes, U2, but I can't believe, won't believe, that people like you and me can't make a difference. Unfortunately, I've been out of the loop for years, down with a kind of Obsessive Compulsive Disorder, but I'm finally getting the hang of how to deal with it and move forward in a positive direction. Sad to say, I lost a lot of time, and I have much catching up to do, but I'll try to pour all my spirit and muscle into it and see what I can push through.

    I don't think that sounds trite per se, simply idealistic, and I think we all have our ideals and ways whereby we ponder them. I know a lot of people give people like Bono grief (rightly or wrongly? Another matter I guess) but I have always had and will continue to have respect for the man in all that he does because he's got big ideas coupled with real passion to make a positive change and I think it's really fresh and positive to see, and it's examples such as himself that give me hope. He's got the status that many don't, but it's always worth remembering that he started out with nothing and through a real determination to make something of his life, he's earnt that, and I think it shows that it's possible for anyone else too.
    Originally posted by platonic:I must admit, this is one delightful discussion, but I definitely have to do some research on setting up a wireless network in my home, or when my brother comes back from his business trip, he'll be on the internet all day and everyone will wonder if I died or something. Do you happen to know a reliable tech forum where I can find tips if I get stuck?

    I'm afraid I haven't a clue lol, if it's technical advice you want I'd drop someone like Drew (drewhiggins - you'll find around the forum somewhere) a line, he's got a lot of nouse with regard to techno-babble
    Originally posted by platonic:See, Harry (is it ok if I use your name?), that's another reason to be hopeful, when we got the next generation coming up already knowing the pantheon of progressive and humanitarian media.

    Feel free m'man, most people use real names here unless someone's name is unknown and yeah I agree, it's very encouraging

    EDIT (1) - firstly, I'm off - great chatting everyone, catch you all soon

    EDIT (2) - I think I've lived up to my billing as King of the Multi-Quote
  2. Originally posted by platonic:[..]

    See, Harry (is it ok if I use your name?), that's another reason to be hopeful, when we got the next generation coming up already knowing the pantheon of progressive and humanitarian media.

    And, Katherine (since it's also your username, I'll go ahead and call you that, unless you'd prefer another nickname), you're right, Rachel does seem to be the warmest of the bunch. I watched her arguing with Pat Buchanan about the race issue in Sotomayor's hearings, the other day, and if that's the most confrontational she ever gets, she is a model of intelligent and measured debate.

    And, lol, yes, chris can get too excited and loud, but I also love him for that. I think they're all great in their own way. Let us not forget Ed Schultz, the hammer of the gods on healthcare.

    Tho I respect him greatly, AC is my last choice, b/c he's on CNN, which has more issues than they're willing to admit. Also, he doesn't zoom in on most issues that really interest me.

    Yeah, it's cool to call me Katherine. I like Rachel the most out of those guys, because, as you said, she seems to be a very warm and sincere individual. Smart too. Although I do have a bit of a crush on Kieth Chris is fun to watch when his giant pumpkin head turns red with rage lol Anderson is the only decent newscaster on CNN, I can't respect any of them other than AC, but he's much more chilled out thn the MSNBC Matthews/Olbermann/Maddow trio, so I find it hard to switch from one of those guys to him, but him and Brian Williams are two of the best out there, IMO
    (But hey, anyone is better then FOX )
  3. Originally posted by WojBhoy:I find myself disagreeing with a few things people around me say, but it helps you learn and accept other people by evaluating the differences in all walks of life, but I believe it's getting the balance between rights and responsibilities. I am no fan of extreme political views such as fascism or indeed Stalinist communism etc., but I also believe that everyone should be allowed to express such views. However, if by such expression one infringes the rights of others, then you forfeit such a right to free speech, and that's where the balance needs to be made and also a key point that I feel many ignore nowadays. There's always a focus on the rights of the people etc., but it is rarely pointed out that with rights comes responsibility, and as I said above, there are those in our societies who neglect to uphold their duties responsibly.

    quick interjection: I guess the greatest problem with Fascism or Stalinism, both being authoritarian gov'ts, is that you might one day disappear from the face of the earth, forever. That being said, at least under some form of communism you'd have a better social welfare net. Of course, that doesn't help too much if the gov't is corrupt as hell and the economy is failing.

    I agree, the responsibilities are taught even less than the rights. It's surprising, though, whenever a survey comes out and people here fail miserably at knowing their rights.

    The recent scandals we've seen in the UK concerning public expenses and politicians abusing their rights and cheating the system, whilst not exactly helpful in the short term, would have been unthinkable 40-50 years ago when the media was much more passive and obliging.

    Is that how it was in the UK? I've heard about how American investigative journalism is faltering. It was at a high point after the Watergate scandal, when the reporter was seen as a hero figure. ... Fast forward some 30 years and the media basically rolled over for a Bush. That's one of the reasons why I'm a fan of Keith Olbermann; he must have been the first one on cable tv to expose the Iraq war for what it really was.
    then I would imagine that you can also draw on the idea regarding the forfeit of rights through the abuse of responsibilities and suffering the consequences.

    at least in your country you can give the prime minister a vote of no confidence, lol
    In the case of the media, I think that the responsibility lies in keeping abuses of power in check through broadcasting information regarding the whys and wherefores etc. BUT it shouldn't abuse such responsibility to the extent of personal gain.

    indeed, pursuing scandals just for the sake of money-grabbing headlines, without furthering the debate, is a waste of everyone's time
    I know a lot of people give people like Bono grief (rightly or wrongly? Another matter I guess) but I have always had and will continue to have respect for the man in all that he does because he's got big ideas coupled with real passion to make a positive change and I think it's really fresh and positive to see, and it's examples such as himself that give me hope. He's got the status that many don't, but it's always worth remembering that he started out with nothing and through a real determination to make something of his life, he's earnt that, and I think it shows that it's possible for anyone else too.

    word
    I'm afraid I haven't a clue lol, if it's technical advice you want I'd drop someone like Drew (drewhiggins - you'll find around the forum somewhere) a line, he's got a lot of nouse with regard to techno-babble

    is 'nouse' some kind of British slang? B/c, if so, I'd like to add it to my vocabulary.
    Also, thanks for the tip. I'll try to find him.
    Feel free m'man, most people use real names here unless someone's name is unknown and yeah I agree, it's very encouraging

    oh, how silly of me, I probably don't have my name on my profile. You can call me Christian, but empyr's kind of my artist's pseudonym, right now.
    EDIT (1) - firstly, I'm off - great chatting everyone, catch you all soon
    EDIT (2) - I think I've lived up to my billing as King of the Multi-Quote

    all right, goodnight, see you next time, then you can answer me what this "King of the Multi-Quote" business is
    Xd
  4. Originally posted by katherine94:[..]
    Yeah, it's cool to call me Katherine. I like Rachel the most out of those guys, because, as you said, she seems to be a very warm and sincere individual. Smart too. Although I do have a bit of a crush on Kieth Chris is fun to watch when his giant pumpkin head turns red with rage lol Anderson is the only decent newscaster on CNN, I can't respect any of them other than AC, but he's much more chilled out thn the MSNBC Matthews/Olbermann/Maddow trio, so I find it hard to switch from one of those guys to him, but him and Brian Williams are two of the best out there, IMO
    (But hey, anyone is better then FOX )

    No kidding Anderson is chilled out - sometimes, he seems too freakin' chilled out Xd for my taste, anyways

    I don't blame you. If I was female, I'd have a crush on Keith, too.

    Lol, Chris is one Irish-American piece of work, right. That's an interesting way to put it, 'his giant pumpkin head turns red with rage'.

    Brian Williams... I don't know what to make of him. I respect him and all, but he can seem so aloof at times (you see him in interviews a lot, sometimes with Jon Stewart - they got some kind of a feud going on, don't they?).

    Bwah, you got the nerve to bring fixed noise into this??!! Xd
  5. Originally posted by platonic:[..]
    No kidding Anderson is chilled out - sometimes, he seems too freakin' chilled out Xd for my taste, anyways

    I don't blame you. If I was female, I'd have a crush on Keith, too.

    Lol, Chris is one Irish-American piece of work, right. That's an interesting way to put it, 'his giant pumpkin head turns red with rage'.

    Brian Williams... I don't know what to make of him. I respect him and all, but he can seem so aloof at times (you see him in interviews a lot, sometimes with Jon Stewart - they got some kind of a feud going on, don't they?).

    Bwah, you got the nerve to bring fixed noise into this??!! Xd

    Anderson is so emotionless during his show, and then he guest-hosts for Regis and Kelly sometimes, and he's the most hilarious person, I don't know what he does, but it's like he has the ability to turn off his emotions completely. Although I have seen him get angry before, it's amazing to watch
    Haha, Kieth is amazing
    Chris DOES have a pumpkin head! It's awesome! Did you ever see when Zel Miller(I think that's who it was...) challenged him to a duel? So funny....
    Aloof is a great way to describe BriWi, he's kind of like Anderson, he almost turns off his emotions when he gets behind his newsdesk, but if you see him on talk shows, or hosting SNL, he's got this hilarious and charming personality. I don't know what to make of it. PSHAW! Him and Jon aren't in a feud, they're probably gay for each other
    Oh yeah, I brought up the Fixed Noise
  6. Originally posted by katherine94:[..]
    Anderson is so emotionless during his show, and then he guest-hosts for Regis and Kelly sometimes, and he's the most hilarious person, I don't know what he does, but it's like he has the ability to turn off his emotions completely.

    Maybe it's something he picked up covering Rwanda
    Although I have seen him get angry before, it's amazing to watch

    This is something I most definitely must see, if only in the hope of someday completing my understanding of Anderson Cooper
    Chris DOES have a pumpkin head! It's awesome! Did you ever see when Zel Miller(I think that's who it was...) challenged him to a duel? So funny....

    I just saw a 21 sec clip of that on youtube. There's a 5 minute version. I have to see that to truly understand the context, but my money is on Mr. Miller making a fool of himself.
    Aloof is a great way to describe BriWi, he's kind of like Anderson, he almost turns off his emotions when he gets behind his newsdesk, but if you see him on talk shows, or hosting SNL, he's got this hilarious and charming personality. I don't know what to make of it. PSHAW! Him and Jon aren't in a feud, they're probably gay for each other

    Is BriWi his official nickname?
    He sure does have a very funny side to him, I've seen that.
    'gay for each other'? I'm sorry if I'm not up to date on the new language, but how exactly do you mean that? Not in a sexual way, I think. Sorry if I'm killing the joke by overanalyzing it, here.
  7. Originally posted by platonic:[..]
    Maybe it's something he picked up covering Rwanda
    [..]
    This is something I most definitely must see, if only in the hope of someday completing my understanding of Anderson Cooper
    [..]
    I just saw a 21 sec clip of that on youtube. There's a 5 minute version. I have to see that to truly understand the context, but my money is on Mr. Miller making a fool of himself.
    [..]
    Is BriWi his official nickname?
    He sure does have a very funny side to him, I've seen that.
    'gay for each other'? I'm sorry if I'm not up to date on the new language, but how exactly do you mean that? Not in a sexual way, I think. Sorry if I'm killing the joke by overanalyzing it, here.

    I think so, he's seen a lot of death in his life...
    He did indeed make a fool of himself, Chris handled it pretty well though
    No, I just like to call him BriWi, it's fun
    LOL!! Actually, you overanalyzing it makes it more funny. It's just that if you watch some of the interviews between Jon and Brian, they have this really funny chemistry and they sorta kinda flirt with each other, so I often joke that they're gay for each other. For instance, Brian was on a week or two ago, and Jon said "If you're Mark Sanford in this relationship, am I your wife or your Argentinian mistress??' to which Brian replied "I'm not sure, but all I know is I'm taking the plane down south"And proceeded to wink at him
    I rest my case

  8. It does have a ring to it
    LOL!! Actually, you overanalyzing it makes it more funny. It's just that if you watch some of the interviews between Jon and Brian, they have this really funny chemistry and they sorta kinda flirt with each other, so I often joke that they're gay for each other. For instance, Brian was on a week or two ago, and Jon said "If you're Mark Sanford in this relationship, am I your wife or your Argentinian mistress??' to which Brian replied "I'm not sure, but all I know is I'm taking the plane down south"And proceeded to wink at him
    I rest my case

    that's right, I remember that
    lol
    wasn't there even more sexual innuendo? too bad there's no clip on youtube
  9. Originally posted by platonic:[..]
    It does have a ring to it
    [..]
    that's right, I remember that
    lol
    wasn't there even more sexual innuendo? too bad there's no clip on youtube


    It does indeed
    I'll post a link in the General Chat topic, we seem to be getting a bit Off-Topic here
  10. Dear Iran,

    Please give us back our hikers.

    Sincerly,
    U.S.A.

    In all fairness, what kind of person goes hikeing in a place in the middle east in a time like this? Tourist make no sense. Did you know there's a company, that promotes tours of the zone of alienation? (the contaminated, and abandoned area around chernobyl.)
  11. Originally posted by wtshnnfb01:Dear Iran,

    Please give us back our hikers.

    Sincerly,
    U.S.A.

    In all fairness, what kind of person goes hikeing in a place in the middle east in a time like this? Tourist make no sense. Did you know there's a company, that promotes tours of the zone of alienation? (the contaminated, and abandoned area around chernobyl.)


    Probably just CIA


  12. I doubt it. If CIA, wants to get someone in a country, usually, they just fly them in, and have them get some kind of menial job.