LIV
Active topics


  1. Geez, didnt know I was even funny without noticing it...you know, this is a great pump-up for my ego...

    Where's your long-expected, 5 pages long review? *rolls eyes*
  2. Nice review, some ppl should post themselves in that section
    However, seens I attended the first night their was alot of hoppla about Bono having harsh voice, indeed he had on few songs
    Some ppl say it was because it was of cold weather and strong winds, indeed it was shitty cold weather more like an evenin in october or somethin
    Im not gonna speculate in that too much, but it wasnt 100% for sure
    Crowd respond was very very bad in some sections, I had sense of it being more a funeral than a rock concert tbh lol
    Wich leads me to why ppl would buy tickets in first place if just to sit the entire show
    Maybe some ppl love to do that, same thing with popcorn at rock concert in my eyes it doesent really go together none of it
    And its contageious, I think the band could feel it as well sadly
    Im slightly disappointed in that way it seemed to be few problems during the show as well with the video screen plus secret words being whispered into Bono´s ear
    Maybe to shorten the show some? Who knows
    This was my first show I attended with them
    I kept waiting for big climax that never came, it felt very flat at times
    It didnt happen really until they started to play older material
    Seemed ppl didnt care too much over all about the NLOTH songs
    It was an OK show but not one of the greater ones
    My only regret is I didnt attend the second one, such difference
    They had it all that night, great weather to start with
    Next year I fly somewhere else , its bit like being robbed off the greater stuff
    Over all it was great night for me personally but I would killed for some more excitement and energy

  3. Pretty stupid including "audience" in "performance", isn't it?


  5. All too true. The second show was really awesome though. I'm very critical to U2's live performances as some of you may have noticed , but it was without a single shred of doubt in my mind at least the second best performance of the tour (not taking into account the crowd and/or setlist/song structure such as snippets singing parts etc) – crowd was 4/5 and performance 10/10 overall. like 96/100 to be more precise. A song or two were like 9/10, but the rest, simply amazing. You wont be disappointed.


  6. Yep

    Originally posted by carlibengarli but it was without a single shred of doubt in my mind at least the second best performance of the tour (not taking into account the crowd and/or setlist/song structure such as snippets singing parts etc) – crowd was 4/5 and performance 10/10 overall. like 96/100 to be more precise. A song or two were like 9/10, but the rest, simply amazing. You wont be disappointed.


    What was the best then?
  7. I am honestly not aware of a better one, but you've gotta have some margin. I don't want to claim it's the best unless it actually is.



  8. Yes, but the performance is still a different thing. True – It can be affected by the audience, but it's not the same thing.


  9. and how is it 'stupid' to meerly mention the crowd in the performance section?


  10. In Holland we would say: mierenneukerij..
    The English would say: picky git


  11. Seeing as how there is an audience section for that kind of thing. Judging the performance itself based on the crowd is misleading.
Contribute to the U2 community with uploading photos or by telling us which shows you have visited.
Contribute to the U2 community with uploading photos or by telling us which shows you have visited.
Contribute to the U2 community with uploading photos or by telling us which shows you have visited.
Contribute to the U2 community with uploading photos or by telling us which shows you have visited.