REC
Active topics


  1. Yes its an excellent recording. Will consider changing it to 5 stars when i have listened it
    Don't forget 4.5 is very near perfect
  2. 2009-08-15 Wembley - Matrix - M!les_Chris Voynet

    I've heard that over and over again. You have to reduce my Matrix (lossless) from wembley 2 to 4.5 stars, cause it's not so good as the berlin recording. . I think the original sources should get 4 stars then. What do you think?
  3. Originally posted by U2Freak999:2009-08-15 Wembley - Matrix - M!les_Chris Voynet

    I've heard that over and over again. You have to reduce my Matrix (lossless) from wembley 2 to 4.5 stars, cause it's not so good as the berlin recording. . I think the original sources should get 4 stars then. What do you think?


    I'll lower it to 4.5
  4. Thanks.
  5. 1997-06-18 - Oakland, California - Oakland-Alameda County Stadium

    There is also no audience-recording. Listen yourself.Both sources are iem, one remasterd, the other one no.
  6. Originally posted by U2Freak999:1997-06-18 - Oakland, California - Oakland-Alameda County Stadium

    There is also no audience-recording. Listen yourself.Both sources are iem, one remasterd, the other one no.


    Fixed
  7. 2009-08-03 - Gelsenkirchen, Germany - Veltins-Arena

    I think you have to correct the ratings. The bootleg from eraserhead should get 3 stars, the bootleg from Frans 3.5 stars.


    Greetz
  8. Originally posted by U2Freak999:2009-08-03 - Gelsenkirchen, Germany - Veltins-Arena

    I think you have to correct the ratings. The bootleg from eraserhead should get 3 stars, the bootleg from Frans 3.5 stars.


    Greetz



    No 3.5 to 4 is fair IMHO Thanks anyway!
  9. Hmm, i think there are better 4 stars recordings of the Tour. The "Arena auf Schalke" is shit to make any audience recordings.
  10. 2009-09-13 Chicago 2 (randombloke version)

    it is definetely not a 4 star recording

    compared to the "prof_peabody" recording from the first night which is also rated as a 4 star recording i would give 3 stars for this one.

    moreover in this bootleg track 2 - 5 are named wrongly and "magnificent" is missing ...
  11. I think 4 stars is ok. They are both better than the ademotte recordings.
  12. Originally posted by krypto1983:2009-09-13 Chicago 2 (randombloke version)

    it is definetely not a 4 star recording

    compared to the "prof_peabody" recording from the first night which is also rated as a 4 star recording i would give 3 stars for this one.

    moreover in this bootleg track 2 - 5 are named wrongly and "magnificent" is missing ...


    Its more than 3 stars imho, maybe 3.5. I gave it 4 because the other recording of the same date already has 3.5 stars and sounds worse.

    Magnificent is not missing but mislabeled like the others. Will upload a fixed copy.
U2start is run by fans for fans. Help us reduce personal costs. Consider to make a donation to support us.
U2start is run by fans for fans. Help us reduce personal costs. Consider to make a donation to support us.
U2start is run by fans for fans. Help us reduce personal costs. Consider to make a donation to support us.
U2start is run by fans for fans. Help us reduce personal costs. Consider to make a donation to support us.