Originally posted by U2Freak999:1992-08-13 - East Rutherford, New Jersey should get 5 stars.
Yes its an excellent recording. Will consider changing it to 5 stars when i have listened it
Don't forget 4.5 is very near perfect
Originally posted by U2Freak999:1992-08-13 - East Rutherford, New Jersey should get 5 stars.
. I think the original sources should get 4 stars then. What do you think? Originally posted by U2Freak999:2009-08-15 Wembley - Matrix - M!les_Chris Voynet
I've heard that over and over again. You have to reduce my Matrix (lossless) from wembley 2 to 4.5 stars, cause it's not so good as the berlin recording.
Originally posted by U2Freak999:1997-06-18 - Oakland, California - Oakland-Alameda County Stadium
There is also no audience-recording. Listen yourself.Both sources are iem, one remasterd, the other one no.
Originally posted by U2Freak999:2009-08-03 - Gelsenkirchen, Germany - Veltins-Arena
I think you have to correct the ratings. The bootleg from eraserhead should get 3 stars, the bootleg from Frans 3.5 stars.
Greetz
Thanks anyway! 
Originally posted by krypto1983:2009-09-13 Chicago 2 (randombloke version)
it is definetely not a 4 star recording
compared to the "prof_peabody" recording from the first night which is also rated as a 4 star recording i would give 3 stars for this one.
moreover in this bootleg track 2 - 5 are named wrongly and "magnificent" is missing ...