Originally posted by MoFoNYR15:[..]
amen
AMEN to that....
Originally posted by MoFoNYR15:[..]
amen
Originally posted by drewhiggins:[..]
Brilliant! So the signs do work.
Originally posted by yuri31:[..]
No, they don't.
[image]
![]()
I'm gonna watch the thing tonight and post my thoughts later.
Originally posted by dieder:[..]
Originally posted by vanquish:[..]
This wasn't a couple of flubs, basically the whole performance was staid. What are they going to do completely overdub the audio with something from another concert?
And ask anyone here if the bands raw, unedited performance on the night was a match for the same at Sydney or Slane.
Originally posted by saskiahidde:Could everybody stop the negativity, please?
- Be thankful U2 broadcasted the LA show. They also could have decided not to.
- Why LA was chosen? perhaps because 90.000 people filled the stadium, live from LA sounds better than live from Denmark and it was dark at the start (sorry Europe).
- Will it be used for a DVD release? Nothing is for certain, remember milan 2005? Everybody was full of it but in the end it was partly included as a bonus for the 18 singles pack.
- Probably shows in 2010 will be recorded too.
-The final DVD release: perhaps footage from different shows.
-Appreciate these guys are still on stage (ask Pink Floyd fans how much they would like their band back on stage)
Till then, enjoy the LA footage or otherwise turn of your computer and put on an old U2 DVD.
R.
Originally posted by markp91:My thoughts:
Okay gig
Great setlist
Horrible camera, needs loads of editing
Crap sound (echo?)
Fucked up Ultraviolet, worst of the tour?
Surprisingly good Stuck In A Moment
Great One, great Streets
Okay crowd: better than former 2 tour dvd's...