1. I'll go 90's. although they wouldbe nothing without the 80's, the 90's was the finished product of that hard work, maybe U2's first chance to express everything they wanted to live with the mony, fan base ect
  2. The best? I can't say..both had their moments.
  3. The 80's - Red Rocks, Live Aid, Self Aid, COH, The Joshua Tree (tour) 87's Rocks hottest Ticket, LoveTown (New Years eve).
    You want more prove?
  4. popmart was fucking incredible
  5. 90s
    00s
    80s

    imo
  6. JT will always be special to me, but I like the 90´s as well
  7. 00s and the 90s.nothing else matters
  8. Originally posted by AllBecauseOfU2:80s. The 90s were brilliant and my favorite decade for them, but they needed to establish themselves first with a foundation of raw energy before they changed direction. You can't chop down a Joshua Tree without first building one.


    100% agree.

    80s for sure.
  9. I thought 80's would have run away with this but it really hasn't.
    An indication of the average age of U2start members?


  10. A rough estimate from the database: 31 years. But not all members have shared information


  11. Probably a good reason why 90's are rating so highly. If average age is 41, probably 80's in a landslide.