Originally posted by RattleandHum1988:[..]
At the same time, they need a commercially successful song for an album to be successful. I don't know about you, but I dig Vertigo and Beautiful Day. Those were the big "rocker" songs on the album that were supposed to get peoples attention, and they were awesome. Now days bands release a hit that does well, then you go and listen to the rest of their album and its totally different, mainly because they know they wouldn't get a hit with their original stuff. U2 tried to release an album with their commercially successful song being Boots, but it was too strange for anyone to like. It wasn't U2 at their finest, it was something strange that the mainstream couldn't comprehend. I still think if they had released NLOTH 2 as the first single the album would've done a lot better.
Bottom line is, I agree with you, yes, they do need to release albums for their fans, however at the same time they need to release them to the masses. Sure a lot of fans appreciate NLOTH, but look at how U2 reacted. They were disappointed (apparently) about the reaction of it from the masses. In the end, they need a good mix of both.
Originally posted by Andrew_C:[..]
agree with you aswell, they need hit single to get new fans, after all if vertigo wasnt released i prob wouldnt have become the U2 fan i am today. People who want an album just for the fans r abit greedy, give people who know nothing about U2 a chance to be hooked in with a killer single like it did.
Originally posted by drewhiggins:[..]
It might have been a good single, but I was under the impression U2 were a rock band, not a pop-rock band.
Originally posted by Andrew_C:[..]
what would u class as a rock-ier song then vertigo, i cant think of many.
Originally posted by dieder:[..]
all because of you. it's more rock-ier, but it's shite
Originally posted by Andrew_C:[..]
haha, i dunt mind it.... id like SOA to have a song equivelent to Vertigo.
Originally posted by Xayide29:No expectations, No disappointments