1. not really all the time... the wireless matrix sound is not always in perfect synch with the picture.
    when you look for example "moment of durrender" the sound match with the screens over the stage but when you look at the band it doesnt match perfectly with the picture.
  2. Originally posted by IwillFOLLOW:[..]

    not really all the time... the wireless matrix sound is not always in perfect synch with the picture.
    when you look for example "moment of durrender" the sound match with the screens over the stage but when you look at the band it doesnt match perfectly with the picture.



    You could always sync it again yourself. Or wait for the official release
  3. Well if the audio is out of sync with the band on stage, then the original webcast audio was off sync too. To align it, I stripped the webcast audio, aligned the matrix audio to that, then reapplied.
  4. Original webcast was indeed out of sync in some players Anyway its still great with the Matrix!
  5. Just looked back and saw that Vertigo//Chicago was released 5 months after it was filmed (almost to the day!)...if U2 were on the same schedule, that puts 360° Rose Bowl out in March 2010. Personally, I think we'll see it more like April or so, because I think a lot more editing will go into this DVD. Special features could potentially be more filling on this release too, considering the massive look and success of the 360° Tour so far. Vertigo//Chicago's special features were fairly sparse, as Vertigo was a relatively "basic" tour for U2, as far as their tours go

    So, any thoughts?
  6. I suppose Spring is possible. I'd rather see a dvd filmed later in the tour; I think Chicago was filmed way too early and doesn't really encompass what tour morphed into (the 3rd leg shows seemed drastically different, visually and energetically). However, it seems obvious that this will be released at some point and I think it will encompass the tour (so far) pretty well.
  7. Originally posted by thefly07:I suppose Spring is possible. I'd rather see a dvd filmed later in the tour; I think Chicago was filmed way too early and doesn't really encompass what tour morphed into (the 3rd leg shows seemed drastically different, visually and energetically). However, it seems obvious that this will be released at some point and I think it will encompass the tour (so far) pretty well.


    Just record a new show in 2010, something special. And why not Wembley...I just don't understand them.
  8. Originally posted by MWSAH:[..]

    Just record a new show in 2010, something special. And why not Wembley...I just don't understand them.


    yeah....idk either...i guess i just don't see them filming another show, even though they did with Milan but that obviously only half counts
  9. Originally posted by thefly07:[..]

    yeah....idk either...i guess i just don't see them filming another show, even though they did with Milan but that obviously only half counts


    The video-crew in Milan had technical problems, maybe that's why they didnt release a whole dvd.

    I hope for a second dvd, an Europe one or one from an exotic place. Moscow, Brasil, Argentina, Mexico.
  10. personally....im sick to death of all the dvds being filmed in america lately....

    elevation BOSTON
    vertigo CHICAGO
    360 tour PASADENA


    no offence to the americans...but fuck off and give europe a chance! Wembley would of been a way better DVD, plus how better does the title sound.,..

    360 Tour Live At Wembley!


    compared to

    360 Tour Live At Pasadena! or Live at The Rose Bowl!


    ssshhheeessshhh, i vote Wembley!
  11. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^


    Please, you all. Do NOT start another discussion about if the European audiences and bootlegs are better than the American or not. Every post referring to that (and of course not made in the Audiences topic), from now, will be deleted.


    Thanks.