Originally posted by MacStripey:at least they did acknowledge and take over the responsibility. it won't change anything that has happened back then, but it is still very important for those who stayed behind, who lost friends, family members, who still live with the vivid memories of that day and what followed after that. Those of us who do not live there, who have not seen and felt it all can hardly imagine what Britain's acknowledgement means to them. I think it is important they did it, no matter how long ago it happened. Difficult topic, my thoughts, stated carefully as a real insight is hard when you depend on books and media on that event.
Originally posted by wtshnnfb01:[..]
A peace-keeping force is only humna, and it is human nature to want revenge when your buddies get killed.
Originally posted by Risto:[..]
If i want revenge i go to the people directly responsible. Not open fire to random strangers![]()
Originally posted by MacStripey:yeah, right. but you know how those things work, when politicians and/or the army and/or the government are involved. Reports of what happened are closed for investigation and held back from the public. People in the responsible positions always know much more than they officially tell. It's the course of history that the facts of truth get disclosed only many years, even decades later. I don't like that, really, but it happens most of the times.
Gerard, what's the talk among the Irish about this British acknowledgement?
Originally posted by wtshnnfb01:[..]
So go Charles Bronson on the IRA?