
I couldn't make a U2 concert seated, no no way.
Originally posted by LikeASong:I couldn't make a U2 concert seated, no no way.
Originally posted by jofice:[..]
Where were you for Dublin 3? Or was it 2? Anyway, how was the sound?
Originally posted by BelgianBono:Here are 2Judge yourself. I hope it helps
[image]
[image]
Originally posted by MacStripey:[..]
I'm with you there. GA and nothing else. But for once I took a seat to experience the whole Claw miracle in its entirety, I had a seat at the Dublin 2 show and was waaaaay up high. The sound was brilliant. But definitely always depends on the venue itself.
oh and.... not one person was sitting up there, we danced and even jumped all the time. It was almost like GA... just that it was way more dangerous, because if one had stumbled, all of us would have fallen down![]()
Originally posted by bobplaysthedrums:[..]
I am not all that impressed with the GA for U2 this tour. From what I saw on the U2.COM Auckland One Tree Hill Video, it looks like the stage is way too low which is strange because it's way too high in the front rows. The whole stage show would be difficult to watch at the same time as watching them on the stage (this is what I do). This was not a problem when I saw Powderfinger (Australian rock band) in the GA The screens on both sides of the stage were only really visible (mostly, I could see them if I turned my head) to the people in the seats and at the back of the GA because the footage on those screens was filmed by someone who didn't know how to use a video camera. The main visuals screen (which was pretty much a midget sized version of the PopMart screen) was in clear view, though.
The cheap seats are best for the 360 Tour, you get to see the whole stage show properly and a lot closer than the rest of the people in seats.
Originally posted by bobplaysthedrums:[..]
I am not all that impressed with the GA for U2 this tour. From what I saw on the U2.COM Auckland One Tree Hill Video, it looks like the stage is way too low which is strange because it's way too high in the front rows. The whole stage show would be difficult to watch at the same time as watching them on the stage (this is what I do). This was not a problem when I saw Powderfinger (Australian rock band) in the GA The screens on both sides of the stage were only really visible (mostly, I could see them if I turned my head) to the people in the seats and at the back of the GA because the footage on those screens was filmed by someone who didn't know how to use a video camera. The main visuals screen (which was pretty much a midget sized version of the PopMart screen) was in clear view, though.
The cheap seats are best for the 360 Tour, you get to see the whole stage show properly and a lot closer than the rest of the people in seats.
Originally posted by sonia_lastrega:[..]
I think it's a show that lends itself to being seen more than once. You really do get a different show depending on where you sit or stand.
Originally posted by germcevoy:[..]
There's nothing wrong with GA on the current tour. The 360 playing area where the band are is fine for height. If you go front row at any stadium gig then you are going to get a sore neck. Get there early and pick your spot.
The cheap seats are good value for money but the audio isn't always going to be great and you are likely to be quite a distance from the band. The cheap tickets are mainly there to subsidies the top dollar seats though (some of which should only really be mid level priced).
Originally posted by Andrew_C:
on the cheap seat idea, my dad sat in one of the $40 seat for the 2nd show and said they were better then the $230 seat we had for show 1![]()