Originally posted by bobplaysthedrums:Miami66 - If you are reading. You say that I am a traitor. I still love @U2, I honestly think it's a great website because of all of the news articles, either written by you guys or from a newspaper or magazine around the world. I was just shocked that you and a few others wrote those things about what people said here on U2Start. Just because we don't want to sign your petition, it doesn't mean that you all can act like that about it.
This is no U2Start vs @U2 fight. They are both wonderful websites for different reasons.
Originally posted by sonia_lastrega:I signed it, simply because U2 should be embarrassed to have such a shit website. Doesn't mean I agree with the somewhat overwrought sentiments in the letter. But really, I'm not renewing either way.
Originally posted by miami66:hahahahahaha
http://www.spinner.com/2011/03/02/u2-fan-club/
Originally posted by yeah:[..]
If I were you, I'd read that article before I advertised it... it doesn't really cast a positive light on that petition...
(btw. how come, this topic is called "boycott" petition when that's not even what you're aiming at?)
Originally posted by bobplaysthedrums:There's no way it will reach 50,000
Originally posted by miami66:[..]
Can you not read?
Originally posted by miami66:[..]
Who cares? At least we're doing something about it. If you want to be apart of it then piss off.
Originally posted by sonia_lastrega:[..]
And that sort of aggressive attitude will make everyone want to associate themselves with you. Because that's the way the world works.
Oh... wait...