Originally posted by ric:[..]
i think you and i have a totally different idea of what the word 'preaching' means! when i use the term i'm only referring to his earnest speeches (preaching like a priest/preacher would).. everything you mentioned (apart from the sarajevo link ups) i never had a problem with and see it as conveying a message rather than preaching, - as you say it was done in a much more subtle way with humour and irony and that worked perfectly for me and is the way things should be done in a live concert situation. i see that as getting the message across in a clever and interesting way rather than bashing people over the head with it relentlessly every night.!
when i said there was hardly any preaching in the 90's i meant he didn't talk about some issue like africa and poverty every night for minutes on end at every gig and it was better that way.
anyway this is just my opinion - i preferred everything about U2 in the 90's - this is just another thing!
Okay, when you put it like that, then I'd have to agree. But from what I've heard/seen so far, it's never been annoying for me. I also agree that in a live situation on stage, the way things were brought forward during ZOO TV and Popmart, were definitely was more subtle and maybe that is the way it should be.
But somehow for me, it's okay what he has been doing so far: I can take a lot of crap so to speak, when it's coming from him....