REC
Active topics
  1. the Montreal's second concert was just posted in my blog

    http://bootslive.blogspot.com


    while i'm uploading the FLAC version, the shared version is mp3 @ 320 kbps version,

    This concert has a remarkable audio quality. really astonishing!

    U2 - 2011-07-09
    Venue: Hyppodrome de Montreal
    Mp3@320
    Web broadcast

    Setlist

    01. Intro (Space Oddity)
    02. Even Better Than The Real Thing (4:25)
    03. The Fly (5:06)
    04. Mysterious Ways - Single Ladies (Put A Ring On It) (4:40)
    05. Until The End Of The World / Where Have All The Flowers Gone? (5:58)
    06. Out of Control (5:05)
    07. Get On Your Boots (3:57)
    08. Bono Speech (3:24)
    09. All I Want is You (5:52)
    10. Stuck In A Moment You Can't Get Out Of (4:48)
    11. Beautiful Day - Space Oddity (6:54)
    12. Elevation (3:57)
    13. New Year's Day (4:48)
    14. Miss Sarajevo (4:48)
    15. Zooropa (3:46)
    16. City Of Blinding Lights (5:33)
    17. Vertigo / Teenage Kicks (snippet) (4:11)
    18. I'll Go Crazy If I Don't Go Crazy Tonight / Discothèque* / Please* / Life During Wartime* / Psycho Killer* (6:25)
    19. Sunday Bloody Sunday (4:27)
    20. Scarlet (2:18)
    21. Walk On (6:13)
    encore(s):
    22. One (6:35)
    23. Hallelujah (1:11)
    24. Where The Streets Have No Name (5:52)
    25. Intermission (3:15)
    26. Ultra Violet (Light My Way) (5:06)
    27. With Or Without You / Shine Like Stars* (5:48)
    28. Bono Speech 2 (1:41)
    29. Moment of Surrender (8:17)


    * Snippet



  2. looking forward to the FLAC version!
  3. download the link file, there's Scarlet inside, remarkable quality!
  4. Why make a FLAC from a lossy source ???


  5. Probably because the audio gets better compared to if you'd compress it twice which would kill it completely.
  6. Question: Was the stream captured directly and saved as WAV (direct stream copy), or captured as MP3 320 Kbs.?
  7. Converting a lossy source to flac doesn't make the quality any better, just increases the file size - It's Still LOSSY


  8. Yes, that's obvious. But if it something lossy is recorded recorded in flac, and then converted to lossy, the flac will be better because it won't have been compressed twice. A better lossy if you will.
  9. Holy damn, that was fast.
  10. Guys, The fly is really awfull quality, not worth downloading this stuff !
  11. Originally posted by Mr_Trek:[..]

    Yes, that's obvious. But if it something lossy is recorded recorded in flac, and then converted to lossy, the flac will be better because it won't have been compressed twice. A better lossy if you will.


    But, what's the point in recording a lossy source in FLAC when you can just record it in MP3 originally? That means you won't lose as much quality.
  12. Originally posted by KieranU2:[..]

    But, what's the point in recording a lossy source in FLAC when you can just record it in MP3 originally? That means you won't lose as much quality.


    There is no point in that.

    I think this source is actually the train_maniac source splitted and compressed again. That would mean these 320 kbit/s would be a lot worse than the train_maniac source.
Contribute to the U2 community with uploading photos or by telling us which shows you have visited.
Contribute to the U2 community with uploading photos or by telling us which shows you have visited.
Contribute to the U2 community with uploading photos or by telling us which shows you have visited.
Contribute to the U2 community with uploading photos or by telling us which shows you have visited.