1. Originally posted by germcevoy[..]

    I see. The need is for new stuff. A 'greatest hits' and a re-release is poor (not to mention boring)


    For some of us maybee. But the need for new fans is strong too. (and of course, moneymaking)
  2. Originally posted by zooTV4all[..]
    (and of course, moneymaking)



    the important point
  3. If I would not so interested in buying this one, I would say that this is a fucking moneymaking project. Nothing but that.
  4. Looks like it's coming closer: Word is that Steve Averill has to deliver the design for that project until next tuesday.
    (Other statements from Steve:
    - There are plans to re-release the complete back-catalogue
    - U2 are working on a project similar to the Passengers with Eno and Lanois as equal members
    - U2 are working on a new album)
  5. Originally posted by germcevoyif this is real they could have timed it better to coincide with the original release. I'm refusing to let myself get excited by this


    in an age where Bono writes for the Spice Girls, i can't blame you.
  6. Originally posted by yeahLooks like it's coming closer: Word is that Steve Averill has to deliver the design for that project until next tuesday.
    (Other statements from Steve:
    - There are plans to re-release the complete back-catalogue
    - U2 are working on a project similar to the Passengers with Eno and Lanois as equal members
    - U2 are working on a new album)


    sounds promising. A re-release of the whole back catalogue? Thats one I don't see the need for at all
  7. Originally posted by LikeASongIf I would not so interested in buying this one, I would say that this is a fucking moneymaking project. Nothing but that.


    Money certainly is a factor here. But I wouldn't see this as a project to make some money. If they'd just re-release the album, I'd agree. But the album will be remastered (and since the sound on most U2 releases isn't the best it's really needed). Plus we'll get a disc of rareties (whatever this means) plus the Paris Concert plus the Outside is America Documentary in DVD quality.

    If that's a rip off, then I'd like to be ripped off more often by this band.
  8. Originally posted by yeah[..]

    Money certainly is a factor here. But I wouldn't see this as a project to make some money. If they'd just re-release the album, I'd agree. But the album will be remastered (and since the sound on most U2 releases isn't the best it's really needed). Plus we'll get a disc of rareties (whatever this means) plus the Paris Concert plus the Outside is America Documentary in DVD quality.

    If that's a rip off, then I'd like to be ripped off more often by this band.


    Valid point
  9. I can't wait to see the artwork.
  10. Originally posted by yeahMoney certainly is a factor here. But I wouldn't see this as a project to make some money. If they'd just re-release the album, I'd agree. But the album will be remastered (and since the sound on most U2 releases isn't the best it's really needed). Plus we'll get a disc of rareties (whatever this means) plus the Paris Concert plus the Outside is America Documentary in DVD quality.

    If that's a rip off, then I'd like to be ripped off more often by this band.
    I can`t help agreeing there. Absolutely right and valid argumenting.
  11. look like its gonna happen just found it on the hmv website
    here a link
    link



  12. Looks like it. I couldn't care less about a re-mastered Joshua Tree album, it's good enough already.

    However, I could care more about the concert DVD. And if it's great quality in pro-shot, that's even better. But the question everyone wants answered is:

    WHERE'S THE COMPLETE FUCKING RED ROCKS DVD?