Originally posted by yeahWhy not?
Originally posted by yeahWhy not?
Originally posted by LikeASong[..]Mainly becuase he hasn't enough points of view to.
Originally posted by yeah[..]
That might be true in terms of performance quality (I'm not even sure about that, though), but I don't get why someone with a few boots shouldn't be able to judge the sound quality.
Originally posted by germcevoyhe can judge but he won't have a lot to compare to therefore making his opinion fairly limited
Originally posted by germcevoy[..]
he can judge but he won't have a lot to compare to therefore making his opinion fairly limited
Originally posted by yeah[..]
Why should he need to compare? Good sound quality is good soundquality. Bad is bad. There's no need for a comparison to know that.
Originally posted by yeahWhy should he need to compare? Good sound quality is good soundquality. Bad is bad. There's no need for a comparison to know that.
Originally posted by LikeASong[..]Back to my beggining (Im sorry, but it's the most reliable source I've got).
The first bootleg I ever got was Madrid 1987-07-15. When I first heared it, i though "OMG!! Such a terrible sound". Now, I actually KNOW that it's a Very Good audience, and a terrific performance. If I had only have had (no pun, just gramatical tricks) this bootleg, I would still thinking "This sound is crap".
Originally posted by yeahYep, but 2 boots might have been enough to tell you that.
All I'm saying is that you don't need to own 500 boots to give a quality rating about the sound. Sure you'll need a little experience, but a handfull of boots can teach you that.
Anyway, back to topic now.
