1. Originally posted by RistoNo that one works fine (Here at least)


    How is GC broken then?
  2. Knew it would hunt me when i sent it Didnt mean broken, more 'fucked up' Just a joke
  3. Originally posted by RUMMY[..]

    Sergio, I need more explanation on how inequalities and this sexual orientation issue are linked. In others, please define your variables A, B, and C in this context.


    This was regarding what we said of "are you implying that every lesbian is unattractive" and the stuff. Not all lesbians are unattractive as Olof implied, but acknowledging that doesn't mean that all of them are attractive either.
  4. I had understood you, Chris, don't worry
  5. Originally posted by LikeASong[..]

    Everyone's a potential bisexual in theory. That doesn't imply everyone IS an actual bisexual


    Note that once was on a door to a lab:

    "In here we combine theory and practice. Nothing works and and we don't know why."
  6. Originally posted by LikeASong[..]

    This was regarding what we said of "are you implying that every lesbian is unattractive" and the stuff. Not all lesbians are unattractive as Olof implied, but acknowledging that doesn't mean that all of them are attractive either.


    I said "attractive" not "unattractive".
  7. O dear Lets just agree that hot lesbians can only be hot if they are bisexual
  8. Let's just agree that girls of all kinds can be attractive. And unattractive.
  9. You are not making sense at all
  10. Some heterosexual girls are hot, some not. Some bisexual girls are hot, some not. Some homosexual girls are hot, some not.


  11. I agree with this.

    Olof, it just didn't make sense. Basically what you should have said was - "Some girls are attractive, some are not".
  12. Elementary penguin singing Hare Krishna.