Originally posted by EyesWithPrideB3Those Horsens gigs fucking ruled to follow live. I remember the streams, the video uplinks, the boots that followed...and the glorious setlist parties, back when we had the luxuries if multi-night stops.
I seriously love setlist parties.
Originally posted by iTim:[..]
See, I want to watch the huge production that U2 and Willie Williams have put into action. The claw, the lights, everything - that what makes the show special. I think the intimate songs should be close up and personal as shown in the Stay video posted earlier, but the big songs should be a mad on screen blur. Ears work well regardless of what's on screen, the editing makes it just that much more enjoyable.
Originally posted by kris_smith87:[..]
What would you campaign on? Banning the Crazy Tonight remix forever?
Originally posted by pleasegone:[..]
Well, I guess we have the best of both worlds with what they have released. I'll treasure Red Rocks and Paris 87, and you can get a kick out of the Rose Bowl show. I like all the concerts, but watching some of them is difficult. If they have to have all the stupid angles and constant scene changes, at least they could have it be a great show. Like jasvan said, record multiple shows, and pick the best one. Bono's voice was shot for most of the Rose Bowl show. You'd have to think that the music would be more important than the visuals, but not this time.
At least with U2, there are multiple releases, so the ones I don't like as much can sit on my shelf. Prince is my favorite, but only two heavily edited live dvds exist. No Purple Rain tour, No 1999 Tour, only a bunch of great bootlegs....at least U2 releases nearly every single tour. Prince fans could count Sign O The Times, but it was re-shot in the studio, so it is sort of live, but with heavy overdubs.
Originally posted by KieranU2:[..]
Definitely not Seattle because that stadium is massive and holds 67,000.
Horsens was one, probably Salt Lake City and Winnipeg too.