1. Just because there isn't a tour doesn't mean you need to lower your standards.

    First - the perverse links need to stop. Second - the personal insults need to stop and third - read the rules.
  2. Yep and dont say we are strict, we are probably the most cool 'cybercops' of the universe. And we are modest too!
  3. Originally posted by drewhiggins:Just because there isn't a tour doesn't mean you need to lower your standards.

    First - the perverse links need to stop. Second - the personal insults need to stop and third - read the rules.

    Hey I'm not doing anything to anyone!
  4. Originally posted by Risto:Yep and dont say we are strict, we are probably the most cool 'cybercops' of the universe. And we are modest too!

    Yeah definitely modest
  5. *sighs* O, how I long for some real U2 news....
  6. Again nobody particular was mentioned. But it is a general reminder....nothing more.
  7. He just wants some attention for him
  8. I can't say there's nothing wrong in that statement. Speaking about the UK, Oasis were much bigger than anything else from 1994 to 1998/2000, including U2. And then, no one picked up their legacy, maybe Muse but still they haven't reached Oasis' infinite levels of relevance and notoriety. He's definitely right. It's just a very badly written piece of shit, but true shit after all.
  9. Sure, Oasis was bigger than U2 from 1995-1998 (even though Oasis opened for U2 during the PopMart tour - that's gotta say something), but U2 was pretty damn big from 1987-1993...REALLY BIG.
  10. Oasis were big in the UK for a very short period of time. U2 have been global stars for decades. Just look at 360, you don't just wake up with that level of global success.

    Oasis would never have been as big as U2 worldwide.