1. Originally posted by ahn1991:[..]

    Compared to all the Vertigo Tour performances, I think mediocre is being extremely generous.

    Nevertheless, I'm glad they played it when they did. I'm sure it was a blast for those there and is definitely a treat for those who weren't.

    Honestly maybe my speakers are broken, or perhaps my ears, but it doesn't sound all THAT different from the vertigo performances..sure it's not as tight and there are some bum notes, but it was probably rehearsed once or not at all, and it was a special moment for the end of the tour. I don't understand why people just can't leave it at that. Comparisons always have to be made. It's the same reason I don't understand whenever you're watching a youtube video of some band or artist on youtube, there's always somebody commenting saying "why does Justin Beiber have x amount of views and this only has y amount?" Who really cares?
  2. Originally posted by LikeASong:[..]

    Don't misunderstand me, I would have KILLED something/someone if that would have meant to get ''40'' at one of my shows And a sub-par performance is light years better than no performance at all But, as I noted on my post, we already do have a sounboard/proshot recording of it! I wish we had the same for some other rarities that were played during the years, starting with my nickname for example. You were incredibly lucky to live that "once-in-a-tourtime" performance of ''40'' and I can only be jealous of you. But the performance itself wasn't from outer space, and being there shouldn't drag you away from that fact

    PS. I'm still jealous, huh? ... hahaha

    Fair enough!
  3. Originally posted by RattleandHum1988:[..]

    Honestly maybe my speakers are broken, or perhaps my ears, but it doesn't sound all THAT different from the vertigo performances..sure it's not as tight and there are some bum notes, but it was probably rehearsed once or not at all, and it was a special moment for the end of the tour. I don't understand why people just can't leave it at that. Comparisons always have to be made. It's the same reason I don't understand whenever you're watching a youtube video of some band or artist on youtube, there's always somebody commenting saying "why does Justin Beiber have x amount of views and this only has y amount?" Who really cares?

    It's personal preference. I personally didn't think 40 was done well, but I enjoyed it simply because it was played.


    On the topic of the actual U22 CDs, U2.com is starting to upload "official" trailers advertising U22. So far I've seen The Fly and Mysterious Ways uploaded to their Youtube channel.
  4. Originally posted by ahn1991:[..]

    It's personal preference. I personally didn't think 40 was done well, but I enjoyed it simply because it was played.


    On the topic of the actual U22 CDs, U2.com is starting to upload "official" trailers advertising U22. So far I've seen The Fly and Mysterious Ways uploaded to their Youtube channel.

    I'm not a subscriber anymore, so I can't watch them. Hence my question: do that trailers feature live footage from the respective performances?
  5. You dont have to subscribe to watch Youtube videos


    The Fly sounds so awesome!!!!!
  6. However, it seems silly that they are showing videos for a compact disc release.
  7. Originally posted by LikeASong:^ I tend to agree with that. The Moncnton performance of ''40'' was a nice adition to thank the fans who had faithfully asked for the song to appear somewhen at the tour. But it wasn't a top notch performance, very far from that. A mediocre performance of a song, whether it's a great song or not, is not worthwhile to enter a compilation of what's supposed to be a "best of" from the tour We already have a proshot&soundboard recording of it, which is more than the 90% of other songs ever performed by U2 at any concert.


    I am a total "40" fanatic, but it was flat. I thought Electrical Storm was near perfect, but read tons of complaints on that one. What made Storm unique, was that they will likely never play it again, and we have "40," on tons of releases. Both Cds should have been 75-79 minutes, and included everything that would fit based on the highest votes.

    I guess I should be happy that we're still getting an awesome release, but I almost wish that there were some law stating that all music cds had to be over 70 minutes.
  8. Originally posted by pleasegone:[..]


    I am a total "40" fanatic, but it was flat. I thought Electrical Storm was near perfect, but read tons of complaints on that one. What made Storm unique, was that they will likely never play it again, and we have "40," on tons of releases. Both Cds should have been 75-79 minutes, and included everything that would fit based on the highest votes.

    I guess I should be happy that we're still getting an awesome release, but I almost wish that there were some law stating that all music cds had to be over 70 minutes.

    Agree completely about Electrical Storm, I don't understand the criticism still LOL 3 years later I still think it sounds good, just not really meant to be a centerpiece of the setlists at the time.

    YES, I would LOVE thme to utilize the complete time allowed! I still don't understand why it's U22, the average show was like U24, and even then, why limit it to that?
  9. My criticism with Electrical Storm live was the riff Edge played during the pre-chorus: at 2:47. To me it just sounds horrible and he should've just played the riff that's there on the album. I realize he probably wanted to change it a bit for the live performance, but to me it wasn't a good change. Other than that it's pretty much phenomenal!
  10. That was actually a criticism of mine too. I hated that riff.
  11. Agree. Completely ruined the performance. Don't even care that it got played.
  12. THAT'S IT!? LOL Isn't that in both the regular band version and the William Orbit mix? It's not that bad, i'm more annoyed at that screechy-winey sound that's WAY TOO LOUD in every version of that song, live or in studio. Nonetheless, it doesn't ruin it for me.