Originally posted by fabian:[..]
131.300.000 voters last time. Please, explain how those four votes had any influence.
You think hes the only one doing it?
Originally posted by fabian:[..]
131.300.000 voters last time. Please, explain how those four votes had any influence.
Originally posted by KieranU2:[..]
Oh, it's on a Wordpress so it MUST be true. It's also written by a conservative. How unbiased, and that Gary P Jackson couldn't write, nor prove a point, for shit. Next.
Originally posted by Risto:Dont get all the union stuff in the USA, here people decide for themselves if they join or not. Union does negotiate contract terms, but they are valid for everyone in that sector, union or not.
Originally posted by wtshnnfb01:[..]
Look up the original FB post.
Originally posted by wtshnnfb01:[..]
You think hes the only one doing it?
Originally posted by KieranU2:[..]
And what do you think is SO bad about that?
Originally posted by fabian:[..]
You think Republicans don't do it?
I don't think this kind of fraud can fix the ten million gap between Obama and McCain.
Originally posted by wtshnnfb01:[..]
Never once said they dont. In recent years the Dems have mastered the art though.
Originally posted by wtshnnfb01:[..]
You mean side from breaking the law, bragging about it, and nullifiing legal votes?
Originally posted by fabian:[..]
That is an assumption you cannot prove.
But as I said, there is no point in this discussion because of the 10 million gap.
Originally posted by KieranU2:[..]
This is getting very repetitive: "You mean aside" is beginning to get boring now.
Okay, so one man breaks the law and suddenly you're all in arms about it? How do you even know that he actually broke the law? What's your proof? Is It could have been a joke, he could have been hacked by a republican? He would've been immediately arrested if authorities found that out. And because Gary Jackson was brainwashing the gullible twats, people will have been plugging those numbers begging for him to be jailed.
Also, I said an 'unbiased' source not 'biased', remember.
Originally posted by wtshnnfb01:[..]
Unbiased of course meaning liberal.