1. There you go:

  2. Seeing as I'm not a Catholic, that tweet means nothing to me, and full disclosure, everyone hates WBC(who last, I checked, ain't killed anyone). Why is it that the second, anyone brings up the threat of Islamist terror, they get accused of racism, automatically? I'm among the first to stand up for Muslims in general, when someone tries to lump them all together, but I have no issues calling Islamist terror what it is.
  3. Since when in modern times did God or Jesus preach to kill in their name?
  4. Originally posted by wtshnnfb01:I'm among the first to stand up for Muslims in general, when someone tries to lump them all together, but I have no issues calling Islamist terror what it is.


    Alright, that's great, you can start with this guy:



    Cause that to me sounds like he's blaming the religion and not the terrorist.

    Terrorism has its roots in extremist views, views on anything, be that any religions or political ideology. Just do a Google search for Catholic Terror and you'll find examples of that too.

    I don't mind anyone bringing up the threat of "Islamist terror" as long as the threat is considered to be the terror and extremism and not Islam and all Muslims or people of Islamic descent in general.
    Same goes for all other religious/political views that some extremists terrorize people in their name.
  5. What you fail to realize, is I have no qualms being an asshole, to get a point across.
  6. Tell you what, I'll start giving the majority of Muslims, the benefit of the doubt, when the left stops vilifying millions of legal gun owners, for the acts of a few crazy people, who usually did not even acquire their weapons legally, and stops trying (unsucessfully) to tie conservatives, to every single tragedy. When they do that, I'll extend Muslims the same courtesy.
  7. Well, if you have issues with the left you should "extend the same courtesy" to them...not Muslims and Muslim descendants.