Originally posted by ReclinerMan[..]
I didn't expect greatness audience quality, either. But it's not bad for a 20 year old recording.
thats true. It's not all that bad at all
Originally posted by ReclinerMan[..]
I didn't expect greatness audience quality, either. But it's not bad for a 20 year old recording.
Originally posted by germcevoy[..]
thats true. It's not all that bad at all
Originally posted by haytrain[..]
IMO, it gets better as you go through the set. Maybe my ears were just adjusting. It's a known fact that I'm somewhat of a quality-snob anyway...
Originally posted by Ali709Sorry guys, I'm not gonna make it for this one...will give you the next show on Sunday and join in for that...can't wait to read your reviews!
Originally posted by germcevoy[..]
not a problem Ali. You sound like you have the show picked already![]()
Originally posted by Ali709[..]
And just a comment on the quality of the show, ...of course it's good for 20 years ago, but the bootleg rating system here shouldn't rate them relative to the year they're from ...I mean just because there wasn't decent recording technology back at 87 doesn't mean that the bootleg should get the same rating as a very clear vertigo show.
Just my thoughts