Originally posted by Genaro92U2:[..]
Most students could easily find a way to torrent it at a coffee shop or another non-University library to be honest. And are you kidding about Radiohead being irrelevant? Lotus Flower was one of the greatest tracks in the last 10 years and it's only been 7 years since In Rainbows. I don't know anyone who doesn't love Radiohead lol.
Originally posted by kris_smith87:[..]
I don't. I don't even think I can name 5 songs by them haha
Originally posted by u2joost:[..]
If someone apparantly has te actual physical release in hand, a leakage cannot be more then 24 hours away....
Originally posted by ahn1991:Let's be honest.
Radiohead is selling out.
*Shots fired*
Their releasing it through BitTorrent is no different than them releasing it through any other means because they are still charging customers for the album. From the consumer's perspective, it's another typical release. I still believe it's way more inconvenient to do it this way because BitTorrent is banned from most public-access internet connections and torrents in general are way less trustworthy.
Originally posted by bartajax:[..]
So, selling an album for way less than usually and in a new way is selling out? How about letting a company pay much more than you could ever make with selling an album and than giving it away for ''free''?
If there is any band in the world, besides The Rolling Stones, who are in the business for making money its U2. Also the latest news about ''reshaping'' the music industry is just and only about making more money with album sales.
And in one of your other posts, you are saying that Radiohead isn't relevant. Who is? Only artists who sell or get plays on some show? Wich in this current time most of the times means they are making shit music (Helloooo Coldplay)?
I know Bono thinks that relevance means money/sells but we don't, do we?