1. Originally posted by LikeASong:[..]

    hahaha, iTour, it actually makes sense. And while a certain band gives you a glowing-in-the-dark bandwrist, our guys give you an iWatch to take pics of the show and stream it for free to your U2start mates - all courtesy of Principle Management and paid by Apple, just like the album.

    Yes, but they will ban everyone with android and windows phones...
  2. LOL at Alvin Dieder and Alex! haha


    A Spanish radio station interviewed Adam Clayton a few days ago and it has aired today... He has "sort of confirmed" (aka we're still working on it) they'll hit Madrid AND/OR Barcelona next year. Which is great news for us, with all the past weeks' concert cancellations I was starting to fear they wouldn't come over here...
  3. If they really do the two-night thing with different shows, and stick to that concept, you can bet your bottom dollar that the tour will be named after the idea.


  4. iTour-----> U2 coming to 500 mln homes for free ( except coffee and a slice of cake) and if you don't want them to perform, you can kick them out of the door...but when you turn around they are still there, until apple release an app to solve the problem
  5. Anyone thought of the idea that each gig may be recorded as a soundboard and be downloadable on I Tunes (for a fee) shortly afterwards?
  6. Originally posted by EyesWithPrideB3:If they really do the two-night thing with different shows, and stick to that concept, you can bet your bottom dollar that the tour will be named after the idea.

    I wonder....will one night be "Songs Of Innocence" and another be "Songs Of Experience"?

  7. Interesting idea, but I doubt SOE will be ready before the start of the tour...
  8. Originally posted by paulc:Anyone thought of the idea that each gig may be recorded as a soundboard and be downloadable on I Tunes (for a fee) shortly afterwards?

    That's an idea that works very well for other bands.
  9. I don't think U2 would ever do that. They're far too old school and it would go against their whole "music is a sacrament" thing. They want people to see their show, not hear it.

    It works for PJ because they switch up their show every night.
  10. Originally posted by LikeASong:[..]

    Yeah, the name is by far the weakest point of the rumour... Your point is absolutely valid. It wouldn't make sense. But if you think about it... There's few songs in the album that they can name the tour after. The Miracle Tour? Pretentious... Every Breaking Tour? Stupid. California Tour? No comments. Tour For Someone? Same. Iris Tour? Goddamn. Raised by Tours? This one actually fits the band But makes no sense. Cedarwood Tour? Nice but won't happen. Sleep Like A Tour Tonight? Haha. This Is Where... there isn't even a pun to do with that title. The Troubles Tour? Same as Cedarwood. So, if they want to name the tour after a song (like they did on Elevation Tour and Vertigo Tour), Volcano is the very only decent option.

    My bet would be for Innocence Tour though.


    Indeed, Innocence Tour would may be nicer, but I quite like Volcano Tour too [one downside: = Elevation/Vertigo 2014 tour...]
  11. Originally posted by RattleandHum1988:I don't think U2 would ever do that. They're far too old school and it would go against their whole "music is a sacrament" thing. They want people to see their show, not hear it.

    It works for PJ because they switch up their show every night.

    Who said anything about PJ?????