Originally posted by BelgianBono:The point is that this only tells how many diehard fans a band/artist still has.
Otherwise you're not gonna buy an album when there's torrents, iTunes, Spotify, Youtube... + You can burn the CD yourself then.
And those diehards (including myself, don't doubt it) are kinda irrational and ridiculous to spend money on any album nowadays.
You're not gonna tell me this isn't the truth.
Yes, I am. Did you read my previous post?
Originally posted by LikeASong:Also, what about the many people (like myself) that doesn't like not having a physical copy of the music he likes? Not only U2, just all music. Not to speak about the high amount of population that doesn't have iTunes at all? I guess many of them will still want to listen to the new U2 album...
May I add: "Not only U2 which I'm a diehard fan, just all music that I like, including dead artists or newborn bands". And I refuse to think I am the very only person in the world who's still buying albums like it was 1985

It's not like the album has sold 25 millions like The Joshua Tree... I think this figures are logical for an album that's been released for free through iTunes, but I don't think it's acceptable to say that these hundreds of thousands of buyers are throwing away their money. In my book, throwing money away equals to buy cigarettes or something like that, not buying a music album in which many people have worked and put their hopes and best wishes. Just my 0'02 tho