Originally posted by BelgianBono:[..]
Indeed...
Fans wanna see Acrobat, heartland, ect...
Originally posted by BelgianBono:[..]
Indeed...
Originally posted by Bloodraven:[..]
Sorry but what you're actually complaining is that they are choosing to play a more interesting setlist for many people than an interesting setlist for you.
The problem is that what you (or I) consider to be an interesting setlist is different to what everyone else considers to be interesting so it becomes absurd to use that as an argument...
Originally posted by cesar_garza01:If I may, I think that is precisely our (hardcore) fandom that makes us hope for rarities after rarities that simply do not go with U2's past history. Everyone that is following their setlists from the 80's knows that they rely in 7-9 songs from their latest album (that later decrease or are replaced with new songs) and a fixed set of hits that the 80% of the public in concerts wants to hear. That's the reality, and that's what we're going to get. The new songs alone are reason enough to be excited for the next tour.
Originally posted by cesar_garza01:Yes, I'm expecting 2 rarities per show. I agree, Sweetest Thing is not in my top 50, but it'll be nice to hear it again. I still think we get the rarities, but with all these problems, accidents and tragic deaths, the band had the pressure of perfecting 1 set for opening night, even if that means "playing it safe".
Originally posted by cesar_garza01:If I may, I think that is precisely our (hardcore) fandom that makes us hope for rarities after rarities that simply do not go with U2's past history. Everyone that is following their setlists from the 80's knows that they rely in 7-9 songs from their latest album (that later decrease or are replaced with new songs) and a fixed set of hits that the 80% of the public in concerts wants to hear. That's the reality, and that's what we're going to get. The new songs alone are reason enough to be excited for the next tour.
Originally posted by Jerry:[..]
But most of the other songs are already played before (besides the new album of course).
Fans wanna see Acrobat, heartland, ect...
Originally posted by blink:For the set list to be interesting,
Originally posted by blink:replacing songs which we've heard a million times
Originally posted by blink:with something else (e.g. from Pop, October, Zooropa....) would suffice (I know, shocking idea right).
Originally posted by blink:This is pretty much the general consensus.
Originally posted by blink:You my friend are blinded by your fandom
Originally posted by AMLBONO:[..]
Very nicely put! So excited to hear these new songs! Plus I always like the changes they put in some of the old war horses. I mean after seeing this band in concert over a dozen times I still get goosebumps when I hear rhe opening chords of WTSHNN!
Just a little over 24 hours till showtime!
Originally posted by bartajax:[..]
Well the fact that they included UV and TUF in 360 was enough. Just 2 or 3 rarities are enough, you can count Sweetest Thing as one of them but if I speak for myself it isn't really a song I would love to hear
Originally posted by treasure:[..]
Wow after following U2 for over 30 years I still get goosebumps too when the screens go red & the Streets intro starts. Even when Streets starts on a bootleg. It's not my favourite U2 song but I always want it in the set