Originally posted by andyrooh
Look at half the people coming out of australian/american idol. They win the competion and you don't see them twelve months later. They are merely marketed in such way as to achieve $$$ quickly (and lots of them) and then we move onto the next superstar. His statement about there being no U2, in my mind is a vision of an industry in a similar state had there been this mindset 25 - 30 years ago. Thank God there wasn't.
Originally posted by germcevoyI though Bono explained it. He simply meant that he wants the music business to lighten up and to stop ditching bands after they release a poor second album. If things had been the same in 1981-1982 then there might not be no U2 today.
Originally posted by djrlewisIt's basically all too money-driven was his point and there's no time for burgeoning creativity. Same's happening in the film industry with all these sequel, three-quels etc and increasingly sanitised ratings (Terminator being a 12A (and shit) compared to Terminator being an 18 (and, well, good)).
Originally posted by andyrooh[..]
As you explained above (being money driven) that's pretty much where I was going with my essay. Lots of dollars and no meaning, if you can't bring home the gold covered bacon, you'll get the arse!
![]()