1. Originally posted by nunomoreira1[..]

    I´ve only watched 10% of all ,but i´m sure i´ll enjoy all of them!!


    Don't expect too much. And don't forget that you'll need 1 week to recover from the shaky and blurry ones.
  2. Originally posted by yeah[..]

    Don't expect too much. And don't forget that you'll need 1 week to recover from the shaky and blurry ones.


    haha. I can honestly say that out of all on my list none have been terrible. Boston 92 was crappish. Can't wait to get may 1oth 1993 burned. Looks great
  3. Originally posted by germcevoy[..]

    haha. I can honestly say that out of all on my list none have been terrible. Boston 92 was crappish. Can't wait to get may 1oth 1993 burned. Looks great


    Zoo Washington was pretty good (the 16th). It's just hard to find good ones.

    Buffalo 2005 (the HD one) looks sweet and another good one is Los Angeles 1987-11-18. The thing to remember is we're getting to see shows, some over 20 years old for next to nothing - the price of a disk envelope, a few blank DVDs and postage. Amazing.
  4. Originally posted by drewhiggins[..]

    Zoo Washington was pretty good (the 16th). It's just hard to find good ones.

    Buffalo 2005 (the HD one) looks sweet.


    well theres plenty of awesome pro-shots. I've still yet to watch a bad audience DVD. I can't watch Vegas 01 because the click track is way too loud. Great mix though on the cameras
  5. Originally posted by germcevoy[..]

    well theres plenty of awesome pro-shots. I've still yet to watch a bad audience DVD. I can't watch Vegas 01 because the click track is way too loud. Great mix though on the cameras


    Give the second audio mix a crack (5.1 Dolby Digital or DTS). It's still a click track but not as bad - I could stand it - nice filming too.

    And Buenos Aires 2006. One word - wow. Wait 'til Basel 93 - you'll absolutely love it.
  6. Originally posted by drewhiggins[..]

    It's just hard to find good ones.




    You think?
    Imho all american audience shots from 2001 on are very watchable, especially U2rmw and octagon do great work. And there's plenty of decent Pro-Shots from previous tours.
  7. Originally posted by yeah[..]

    You think?
    Imho all american audience shots from 2001 on are very watchable, especially U2rmw and octagon do great work. And there's plenty of decent Pro-Shots from previous tours.



    2001-06-22 East Rutherford is awesome
  8. Originally posted by germcevoy[..]

    2001-06-22 East Rutherford is awesome


    Is it? I never watched that one. I try to avoid the 1st leg Elevation shows. The worst period in my U2 book. .
  9. Originally posted by germcevoy Can't wait to get may 1oth 1993 burned. Looks great
    It IS great, dear. You'll enjoy it
  10. Originally posted by yeahIs it? I never watched that one. I try to avoid the 1st leg Elevation shows. The worst period in my U2 book. .
    I share that opinion. Except a few good shows (San Jose, both performance and sound are great, for example) it is a skipable gap of 3 months The same happens to me with some PoPMart months...
  11. Originally posted by yeah[..]

    Is it? I never watched that one. I try to avoid the 1st leg Elevation shows. The worst period in my U2 book. .


    it's worth a watch. Great 2 cam mix. Chris Voynet audio sounds awesome and a fairly decent performance. Edge makes a guitar switch during Streets too which is cool. Think I lost the show as it was backed up on my iPod. I'll have to download it again
  12. Originally posted by germcevoyit's worth a watch. Great 2 cam mix. Chris Voynet audio sounds awesome and a fairly decent performance. Edge makes a guitar switch during Streets too which is cool. Think I lost the show as it was backed up on my iPod. I'll have to download it again
    I just read that problem on other topic. Im so sorry, i know how it feels when you get lost some shows or they just disappear like ghosts.... Not good at all