Originally posted by treasure:Without 80's U2 their would have been no 90's U2 ?

Originally posted by treasure:Without 80's U2 their would have been no 90's U2 ?
Originally posted by LikeASong:[..]
Without 70s there wouldn't have been 80s - and that doesn't mean the 70s are their "best decade", which is what we're asking here
Originally posted by treasure:[..]
The "Outside it's America" documentary comes to mind
Originally posted by cesar_garza01:Here's the thing: people say that 90's were their moment of "freedom" or when they were "innovative". but what were the 80's then? Pop was different from previous U2, but not very innovative compared to the music that was dominating clubs in 96-97. They evenborrowedsampled from other bands in the album (and it's my favorite U2 album), but in the 80's all you can hear was freaking Milli Vanilli and glam rock bands. No other band sounded like U2 then. The Unforgettable Fire was a departure from traditional U2 as dramatic as Achtung Baby (if not more, as some songs like God Part II and Night And Day already hinted their transformation).
Originally posted by BelgianBono:[..]
I don't get your point...?
Originally posted by RattleandHum1988:The 90s are only what they are because they built on what was done in the 80s. Can't have The Fly without politically aware and overly modest 80s Bono, etc.