I find it so weird to see people say they wish this album was more “Dad-rock” while also saying they want U2 to go against the grain.
Originally posted by kris_smith87:[..]
Really though, what do you consider “rock n roll”? Cause Achtung Baby isn’t “rock n roll” to me. If anything it would have been “alternative”. But not it is classic rock.
This album sounds modern but it doesn’t sound like what is at the top of the charts now. That is ridiculous to say. It doesn’t sound like rap, it isn’t EDM
Originally posted by RattleandHum1988:I definitely dig the variety in opinions though, as much as it surprises me
I find it so weird to see people say they wish this album was more “Dad-rock” while also saying they want U2 to go against the grain.
Originally posted by MoFoNYR15:[..]
Awesome! Me too. I want people to love this album and as Sergio said I’m sure these songs will sound better live.
Originally posted by ferrari:[..]
Good opinion. I do like SOE, but misses a bit The Edge. For me SOI is better, but would not say miles better.
In general I am happy that U2 still making albums and not sounds like they did 30 years ago.
Originally posted by revanbenade:[..]
I think it is the concept of what constitutes a genre that was confusing me. I associate Chuck Berry, Little Richard and Elvis' Jailhouse Rock, etc with rock n roll. The fact that your profile pic is Zooropa, like mine, added to the confusion...I've never considered Zooropa to be rock n roll, or even AB, JT, etc. The early U2 is more punk. Additionally ATYCLB is as far as SoE is from r n r.
But it's all subjective.
Originally posted by LikeASong:[..]
Finally, your opinion!
I kind of agree, being a rock fan makes it harder to appreciate a straightforwardly-poppy album like this one... But having ears open helps a lot. I don't consider most of Passengers, The Unforgettable Fire or Rattle And Hum to be "rock" but I like them anyway because they have the U2 seal and the U2 scent - even if they're playing a different game to what I'm used to love them for.
I'm pretty confident this new songs will improve when they play them live. At the end of the day they're a rock band, and no matter how overcooked and cheesy are the songs in their studio form, they can make them rock live.
Just out of curiosity, which are these "good songs somewhere" for you?
Originally posted by kezman:I've always considered U2 a rock band,i mean sure they've had their fair share of gentle songs and plenty of mainstream hit singles but that does not make them a pop act.
All of U2 's albums are great in their own way,thats why i love the band.
Originally posted by MoFoNYR15:[..]
It’s still early. I’ll get back to you. But I can honestly say I prefer your version of SOL hands down. I’m gonna give another listen tonight at the gym. Still haven’t got to Book of heart.
Originally posted by kezman:I've always considered U2 a rock band,i mean sure they've had their fair share of gentle songs and plenty of mainstream hit singles but that does not make them a pop act.
All of U2 's albums are great in their own way,thats why i love the band.