Originally posted by drewhigginsWhat is this sudden fascination with Slane 2001? I must have missed it...
Originally posted by drewhigginsFor the performance aspect, it'd be the best. For the best audio (not for the performance or camera work) it'd have to be Chicago 2001. The drums sound like they reverb and the beats are released quickly - just from the centre channel.
Originally posted by aussiemofoLet's face it - All 5 official concert DVDs are compulsory viewing.
Originally posted by SalvationTambourine[..]
Yeh. Popmart Mexico more for the just getting to see what Popmart was like than the performance though. They filmed Chile aswell, why wasn't that released instead of Mexico? what do you guys think? i though Bonos voice was kinda shite in Mexico and the band was only ok. but Chile is a great show!
all the DVDs a worth watching though!
Originally posted by germcevoy[..]
Santiago in it's current state is maybe better than any of the official releases. It would be thee best if U2 got their hands on the proper masters and worked on it a little.
Originally posted by SalvationTambourine[..]
yeh.well you never know but a second release from the Popmart tour seems pretty unlikely now.
Originally posted by germcevoyPopmart will be 20 or 25 years old one day. . . .
Originally posted by mattfromcanadaAll CD'S
7" - Three
Originally posted by AllBecauseOfU2[..]
Originally posted by SalvationTambourine[..]
Yeh. Popmart Mexico more for the just getting to see what Popmart was like than the performance though. They filmed Chile aswell, why wasn't that released instead of Mexico? what do you guys think? i though Bonos voice was kinda shite in Mexico and the band was only ok. but Chile is a great show!
all the DVDs a worth watching thouh!
Originally posted by aussiemofo[..]
They do always do a practice run at filming a show before they do the real one. Perhaps Chile was the dress rehearsal?