Originally posted by miryclay:[..]
It could be a legit fan. I bought mine off of Stubhub at under FACE.
Originally posted by MattG:[..]
They aren't all necessarily scalpers
Originally posted by MattG:[..]
Right, I'd never buy over face value from them instead of Ticketmaster, but when they sell tickets at a loss, they become the sucker - not me.
Originally posted by deanallison:[..]
Yeah there’s no harm in paying face value or less than face value in the secondary market.........
I’ve went to a few gigs where I’ve got tickets outside the venue for well under face value.
Originally posted by ddarroch:Sorry, IMO, you're part of the problem, not the solutiona small part.
Originally posted by Bloodraven:deanallison is right on paper... but on reality it works as ddarroch says...
Originally posted by ddarroch:[..]
Why? Why just blame those gullible people that are prepared to pay stupid money for tickets. Why not take personal responsibility (not you Bloodraven) & acknowledge that every ticket bought from a scalper props up their market.
Look at all those $40 seats behind the stage. If scalpers sell them at a $1-$2 under face it's no skin of their nose, a 2-5% loss. If the scalper it's unable to sell the ticket is 100% lots. There is a HUGE difference for the scalper between unloading tickets close to face & not being able to sell them at all.
Yeah, we can say it's all the fault of those suckers that pay 200% above face. They're the one spring the market. But the tickets sold at stupid profits are probably only a small proportion of tickets sold by scalpers.
Yes, those are the tickets where the big profits are skimmed of the top. But it's the majority of tickets, that are bought at a few dollars above face, at face, or even a few dollars below face that prevents losses for the scalper, propping up their market.
Heck, I'm happy to take a ticket of a scalper, but only if it's free. Every single cent is helping them, not just every cent above face.
Originally posted by deanallison:My argument is perhaps only right on paper because we know almost for a fact that people will panic buy and pay more than face value. However if we’re making that assumption I think we can also make the assumption that unless laws come into place then we’re not going to get rid of scalpers anyway so what’s the point of making a very small stance against it and potentially missing out on a show for face value or missing out on getting a cheaper ticket when others have already done the damage by forking out crazy sums of money.
Originally posted by deanallison:My argument is perhaps only right on paper because we know almost for a fact that people will panic buy and pay more than face value. However if we’re making that assumption I think we can also make the assumption that unless laws come into place then we’re not going to get rid of scalpers anyway so what’s the point of making a very small stance against it and potentially missing out on a show for face value or missing out on getting a cheaper ticket when others have already done the damage by forking out crazy sums of money.