
Originally posted by Zwervervriend:Just because the last couple of shows of E+I tour were fabulous doesn't make the whole tour great. The first 3/4 of the tour was not that great. JT was nice nostalgic, but i realy missed Bono's guitar playing (whoever guessed that) and graphics were breathtaking, but i enjoyed I+E far more because of the variation en crowd participation.
Originally posted by Janus02:1) I&E
2) JT
3) E&!
For me E&I was their worst tour ever. Even Acrobat and the AB songs couldn't save this tour.
Originally posted by Janus02:1) I&E
2) JT
3) E&!
For me E&I was their worst tour ever. Even Acrobat and the AB songs couldn't save this tour.
Originally posted by Ricku2:[..]
that would be a bad thing, but I don't think I'm doing that.... that's why I came up with the Modric thing.. like I said before, I do understand the sentiment, but people seem to forget about the main thing... Modric is just a good soccer player, nothing more, nothing less....Wild Horses was great and the highlight, but Until The End Of The World is probably a better live song.. it's fine if you enjoy the new songs, but I don't think you should prefer a tour because it had Wild Horses, Acrobat and Stay.... yes, it did, but it was also missing a lot of all time (big) favourites... JT had Exit, Mothers Of The Disappeared, Trip, God's Country, One Tree Hill, Red Hill, Running To Stand Still and more.... I'm ok with different opinions, I just don't agree with the arguments and I feel there is some weird kind of bias toward E&I...
And of course this was the worst U2 show ever: [YouTube Video]