Originally posted by RUMMY:[..]
Are you listening to it twice?

Originally posted by RUMMY:I think you're giving yourself too much credit for the BEST way to spend that time!
Originally posted by RUMMY:[..]
Are you listening to it twice?
Originally posted by RUMMY:I think you're giving yourself too much credit for the BEST way to spend that time!
Originally posted by LikeASong:[..]
Is there any other way to listen to Stay?![]()
Originally posted by ASortOfDesire:[..]
Thrice?
Originally posted by ASortOfDesire:[..]
Thrice?
Originally posted by hedyzera:I'm not surprised that Stay belongs to Zooropa.
to me its represents one of their best creative peak.
Originally posted by RattleandHum1988:[..]
It's weird, it's like it both belongs, and doesn't, because it doesn't sound like any other song on the album.
That being said, none of the other songs really sound like one another either. Zooropa was U2 doing whatever the hell they wanted, not really worried about how commercially successful it would be, because the ZooTV campaign was still going full-force. It was a bonus album, one nobody expected or even really needed, and I think that's why it's so damn creative.
That's not to say they weren't still chasing great songs, but I think it was less about chasing hits than it was about seizing the moment with all of the creative energy and writing something interesting and creative rather than chart-topping.
That energy would go on to birth Passengers.
But hey I don't need to give a history lesson to all of you historians
Originally posted by LikeASong:[..]
No Zooropa song sounds like any other son on the album
EDIT. Sorry, answered before getting to your second paragraph![]()
EDIT2. I SO wish they approached their next album like this again: "less about chasing hits than it was about seizing the moment with all of the creative energy and writing something interesting and creative rather than chart-topping.![]()
Originally posted by RattleandHum1988:That's not to say they weren't still chasing great songs, but I think it was less about chasing hits than it was about seizing the moment with all of the creative energy and writing something interesting and creative rather than chart-topping.
Originally posted by RattleandHum1988:Book of your Heart hints at something a little different, but I don't really think they have it in them anymore to make a song sound different.
Originally posted by ASortOfDesire:[..]
Couldn't agree more. I doubt anything like Zooropa or Pop will ever happen again. In the 80's and 90's, nearly every album sounded different from all the others.
I love SOI and (parts of) SOE, but there's no denying that U2 hasn't changed their sound since 2000...
[..]
...except maybe for this song, a handful of NLOTH tunes, and Sleep Like A Baby Tonight. But those are the exception, not the rule.
Originally posted by RattleandHum1988:[..]
Definitely.
I maintain that Cedars of Lebanon is the most interesting (sounding - maybe just in general even) song they've released since Pop.
I was kind of heartbroken to find out a lot of the personality of that song is a sample of a Brian Eno tune, but still - they made it their own and it works really damn well. They should do a whole album sampling Eno stuff lol.