1. Originally posted by RattleandHum1988:[..]
    Agreed. It was a proven formula until it wasn't - you can only catch lightning in a bottle so many times, and being that NLOTH was maybe one of their worse albums (in my opinion) - I don't want them to try going up that alley again when it didn't work so well the last time. Not unless they were committed to releasing an album without worrying about performing, chart positions, etc. (which is what caused them to add songs like Boots to the album).

    [..]

    IF the next one is their last album, then yeah - there's no other choice. I really don't see U2 doing it, they're not nostalgic like a lot of their fans are - but not calling their final album Man would be a hugely wasted opportunity.

    I've said this before to much disagreement, but I'd even be okay with "Man" being the final album they record - but it being a re-recording of Boy, all this time later. Let Bono frig around with the lyrics if he wants (he does it live anyway), let the band change up the arrangements if they want, etc. I think it'd be a really cool way to cap off their career, revisiting those tunes but having done everything in-between.

    What would that album look like all these years later? Would I Will Follow change from being about Bono's mother following him, to Bono following his own children? Would Out of Control be more about waking up in an older man's body, but still with that fiery rage inside?"Monday Morning, 60 years of dawning, still say hoooow loooong" - that might seem cheesy to some but it's cool as hell to me. Would A Day Without Me turn from a tongue-in-cheek song about arrogance to a self-reflection of what impact Bono has had on the world? Would it be better? Worse?

    Fuck I want that to happen.
    Goddamn it Alex now I want that album so bad
  2. Well shucks, guys! Glad I'm not the only one who thinks that'd be awesome

    And of course the cover would have to be a picture of Derek Rowen as he looks now (although I think even this picture is a bit outdated already):
  3. Originally posted by RattleandHum1988:Well shucks, guys! Glad I'm not the only one who thinks that'd be awesome

    And of course the cover would have to be a picture of Derek Rowen as he looks now (although I think even this picture is a bit outdated already):
    [image]
    Derek who?

    And would he want to be bothered with U2 now, I'm not sure.
  4. Guggi’s little brother! And I’m pretty sure Bono and Guggi are still close, so I’m sure Bono and this fellow talk once in a while too - who knows.

    Throw enough money his way and I’m sure he’d agree to do it :p
  5. I’d be down for a re-recording of Boy and have it be called Man. Be like them coming full circle and all
  6. Ha you don't know who he is and you call yourself a U2 fan???? Of course he would be bothered he is in the circle and is Guggi's brother but calling the album Man is too bloody obvious it should be called "Achtung Daddy"
  7. Originally posted by popmarter:[..]
    Ha you don't know who he is and you call yourself a U2 fan???? Of course he would be bothered he is in the circle and is Guggi's brother but calling the album Man is too bloody obvious it should be called "Achtung Daddy"
    His name is Peter Rowen, no?

    That's what I was trying to say.
  8. Why stop at Man? I want to hear November!
  9. Right you are! That was my error originally :p sorry to derail the discussion, folks
  10. The reworked Boy idea only fits as a bonus disc on a re release for me. It shouldn’t be a stand alone release or be promoted as a new album or even suggested to be. What I do like about the idea of a ‘Man’ album but separate from the reworked idea is to reflect on Boy, they could maybe even reuse certain lyrics like they did on SOE from SOI. If they can draw inspiration from Boy in a very direct way then I think that could be a good thing.
  11. And then Peace! Which... would be A Very U2 Thing To Do o dear o dear now I really like this idea