Originally posted by bazzzz:[..]
yes i totally agree mate
Originally posted by bazzzz:[..]
yes i totally agree mate
Originally posted by blueeyedboy:[..]
haha... if i complained out loud about my birthday gifts i woulda gotten a backhand to the back of my head for not being grateful!
Originally posted by deanallison:[..]
if we go back to a time the stones were at the same age as u2 are now they were doing greatest hits sets.
Originally posted by eddiemonsoon:[..]
oh dear, wrong again Jagger is 74, bono 58. so 16 years ago the stones were doing a tour that swapped between theatres, arenas and stadiums and varyong the set every night.
https://www.iorr.org/tour02/index.htm
Originally posted by eddiemonsoon:[..]
oh dear, wrong again Jagger is 74, bono 58. so 16 years ago the stones were doing a tour that swapped between theatres, arenas and stadiums and varyong the set every night.
https://www.iorr.org/tour02/index.htm
Originally posted by deanallison:[..]
and not touring a new album again. Although they did play some decent rarities in the theatres.
Originally posted by BonoVox05:Why can't they deliver something like Bad into So Cruel, as an example? Do it on the second show of Chicago. They would blow us away. Why not? Lazy F****!
Originally posted by BonoVox05:[..]
That's fine, but i saw U2 in their prime. Now, they are miles away from that. I don't blame them, but it's still a fact. At least to me. There is no energy anymore, they just play down their set, that's it. I could drive to Berlin in about one and a half hour, but i wont, i can't stand this old daddy rock show. I don't wont to see a musical, at least, not from U2.